Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Urgent, help 1-sentence on why we oppose each of the 10 judicial nominees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:17 AM
Original message
Urgent, help 1-sentence on why we oppose each of the 10 judicial nominees
Trying to get through to C-SPAN this morning, can someone fill me in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because Bush only appoints right-wing religious ideologues....
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. These ten judges...
have demonstrated time and again that they will push their morality from the bench. They're not interested in the law, they're interested in their version of morality. Hope that helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is the Senate constitutional role to advise and consent and to
sometimes advise not to accept judges who have a history of letting their personable beliefs and, not the law, guide their decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Of any administration's appointments..
.... 5% are going to be unsuitable for the job, and that is why we have the advice and consent of the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. 10 out of 205
be sure to point out that 205 have made it thru. only hold up on ten. that is only 4-5% of choices not allowed thru. the repugs denied over 46 of clintons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'd like to know personally about these people
Why are THEY objectionable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC