Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Edwards on CSpan right now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:27 PM
Original message
Elizabeth Edwards on CSpan right now!
Check this woman out - you'll be impressed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. finally she arrived and is speaking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's great, isn't she?
Did you hear her say, "Oh,my bad!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. She is very good, as he is, at sounding like your next door
neighbor.

Very interesting that she is talking strategy with the women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I also found her very amusing for saying
"ok, is there anyone here who DOESN'T know that John is the son of a millworker, first to go to college in his family, etc." so that she could then get into what she wanted to talk about.

She is fanTAStic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's certainly no Jackie Kennedy. She's a bit homely for a man like him
How long until infidelity stories start bubbling up, you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's an offensive thing to say and illogical to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. so you think someone won't "drudge" up a story?
Edited on Fri Jan-23-04 02:47 PM by overground1
It's neither offensive nor illogical. The woman is no Jackie Kennedy. That is just an obvious fact. She married WAY up. You can't deny it.
When you have a guy as good looking as Edwards with a wife as homely as his, then you are bound to have infidelity rumors, and people will likely believe them. That's not illogical at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. John Edwards has been around for a while and there's not a hint
of scandal or an iota of evidence about infidelity. They can start all the rumors they want to, it won't stick.

Moreover, given Edwards fierce devotion to his family, I wouldn't want to be the one who tries to start a rumor about his fidelity. They'd get their asses handed to him - he'll eat them alive for screwing with his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. it is offensive to comment on wives' looks. It is something
Edited on Fri Jan-23-04 02:52 PM by spooky3
we see at FreeRepublic and has no place here. It is sexist to value a woman primarily on the basis of her physical attractiveness rather than her intelligence, personality, achievements, and talents.

It is illogical to argue that, because a woman is not as attractive as Jackie Kennedy, that her husband might stray, because Jackie's attractiveness obviously did not keep her husband from straying. That ought to suggest to you that the reasons men and women stay together are far more complex than physical attractiveness.

Did I make it simple enough for you to get? I have chosen not to raise the question of whose business it is if either of them has no affairs or a thousand.

I've alerted the mods. Perhaps they will be more liberal in their views as to what is sexist and offensive than I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. the question is if others especially in the gossip media or GOP will do it
We can sit around here acting as "un-sexist" and "un-looksist" as we want, but it won't stop the rest of the world from being so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's ridiculous
Are only supermodels entitled to fidelity from their husbands?

Shame on you for even raising this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm not saying one way or another, but you know how the gossip media works
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No, the gossip media works just like you're doing
by trying to start some mess by pretending to ask an innocent question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I ask 'cus I think they'll do it - they even call him the "next Clinton"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. why don't you stop posting and listen to Elizabeth.
That's what I am going to do now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. give it up - Edwards will destroy Bush
ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I don't believe that's why you asked
Edited on Fri Jan-23-04 03:01 PM by beaconess
If you really believe that Republicans are chomping at the bit to attack him fidelity issues, his wife's looks are irrelevant.

This is one of the issues that we don't need to flesh out on our side in order to stave off Republican attacks. It's smarmy and tacky and has no place in this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. She's great looking, especially considering she's 53.
And she was totally hot when she was young:

http://www.JohnEdwards2004.com/image.asp?id=12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. is that JRE with a 'stash in the photo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. yes, it seems she was good looking when she was young
but it also looks like she hasn't kept up so well with John. I'm not saying she's approaching Barbara Bush territory or anything yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. She's three year older. I'm sure a President Edwards will catch up with...
...her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. He still looks pretty much the same as he did then
But I wonder how he would have held up if he had given birth to four kids, one within the last three years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. "She's no Jackie Kennedy" -- WHO IS???
Who can't see that this woman is formidable. Wasn't she great?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Jackie Kennedy wasn't even Jackie Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Heads nod when people talk about Edwards's ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC