Was Laura's Little "Routine" Payback For CONdi?

Dinger

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-04-05 09:32 AM
Original message

Was Laura's Little "Routine" Payback For CONdi?

Edited on Wed May-04-05 09:35 AM by Dinger

Her smutty references to her lying, murderous husband the other night made me wonder...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

smoogatz

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-04-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message

1. More likely an attempt to divert attention

from the polls, SS, DeLaygate, Iraq, etc., and to humanize W--who lately has been coming off as the arrogant little fascist prick that he is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Dinger

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-04-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1

2. True, Very Eloquently Put smoogatz (nt)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Totally Committed

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-04-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1

3. And now, it seems that the Extremist Wingnuts on the far right...

are "offended" by THE DAILY SHOW's routine about it. Why aren't they offended about Laura saying what she did in the first place?

What a bunch of hypocrites! I agree with smoogatz -- it does humanize Bush, and I believe that was what it was supposed to do.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Jade Fox

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-04-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1

4. Yes, they're trying to make the Bushs look hip, and less like...

facistic tools of the Religious Right.

It will work about as well as George's "joke" about looking under tables
for WMD's.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Totally Committed

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-04-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. So much for being the Party of ...

"Family Values".

Whenever you see the Republicans and their Fristian Regressive RW talking "Family values" and besmearching the Left, you can now say that according to the First Lady, the Bushes are pro-beastiality.

"Beastiality: The NEW Family Value"

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

manly

(278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-04-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. a quibble

Edited on Wed May-04-05 04:46 PM by manly

Not to detract from the point you're making, but that's "bestiality". Why, I don't know. Sort of like the spelling of
sacrilegious and liquefy. I can't explain it, but that's the way the dictionary has it.
And besmirching.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sun May 05th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.