Regarding the leaked UK memo, attached is link to a William Pitt article which sums up the information and the emotion pretty well, I think. Despite its practical absence from american media, this issue appears to be a huge story oversees, as it should be.
I'm wondering if there is enough capability for discussion left in our country to process what should be a damning, embarrassing, criminal misdeed on the part of the administration. Eric Alterman has suggested that a lack of effective discourse is crippling our democratic process. I'm imagining that, as discourse and analysis declines as a capability, there is a point beyond which the public cannot effectively handle an issue like this.
So the question is, as a nation, DO WE HAVE ENOUGH INTEGRITY, COURAGE, SKILLS, AND COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE LEFT TO DEAL WITH AN IMPORTANT ISSUE? Or is our level of discourse and processing so compromised that a politically damaging story can never get off the ground with enough people?
Clearly, the public can process stories like Lacy, Terry, and Michael. Can we deal with significant, real, political stories in a rational, honest way? This remains to be seen. Certainly, there are effective writers and journalists like Pitt who can eloquently and accurately describe this issue. But Pitt's words and his sentiments will not reach the vast majority of people.
How this issue evolves and what level of discussion it generates will be very, very telling in terms of where we are as a democracy.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/050605Y.shtmla snip:
We need two exit strategies: one to get our forces out of that country as soon as humanly possible, and the other to get George W. Bush out of the White House and into a cellblock in The Hague. Save a bunk for Mr. Blair, too. Criminals belong in prison.