Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH 08 ??!!?? WTF

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 04:58 PM
Original message
BUSH 08 ??!!?? WTF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OrwellwasRight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is Jeb's middle name?
Also, if cafepress is selling that crap, can't we get a different vendor (e.g., a progressive vendor) for DU products? Why support bipartisan capitalistic enterprises?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ellis
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrwellwasRight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. OK, now I am scared.
WTF does that stupid button mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. I'm willing to bet
that it's some repug retard who doesn't know that there is a two term limit...they are some really stupid people after all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. JEW?
won't fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. "jeb" are his initials - john ellis bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Excellent point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
72. I agree...it kills me to see the "pro bush", "pro war" bullshit
at cafe press.

I would rather not support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. After everything else they've done, did you really think they'd let a
Edited on Sun May-29-05 05:04 PM by cornermouse
little thing like presidential term limits stand in their way? I wouldn't surprise me at all if they change this too. They're terminally stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They'd have to amend the constitution or suspend elections to do it.
The only way to suspend elections would be to declare a national emergency and martial law. And there'd have to be a major attack on US soil to justify tha...

Uh-oh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. No, they will just find an exception. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. good I hope they get rid of term limits
Then they'll have to deal with the big dog in 08, it won't end well for the bushes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
59. Big dog isn't doing all that well at the moment
I don't even know if he would be up to campaigning in '08. But Clinton at full strength would wipe the floor with Bush, no question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. It's called being terminally evil.
I wouldn't put anything past these monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JRob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
51. you saved me the typing... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
66. oh, you know some stupid ass repug congress person is going to
try and submitted a bill for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. It must be so all the cretins with W 04 stickers on their cars
Can change to W 08 and not look like they are gloating.

My alternate theory is that it is the work of a democratic operative who knows these people are so stupid they re-elected the worst president in American history. Which means that they are very, very stupid-so they'll probably never even know they have been chumped.

The scary possibility is they want to re-amend the Constitution and get rid of term limits. I have heard speculation along these lines before. But that will be impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. term limits
if they do change term limits for past Presidents, that means that Clinton could run again too!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Exactly!
I was thinking the same thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Yep
You know they don't want that to happen! Would he run again though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. Hi tulsakatz!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
71. Dig your avatar.
It was indeed Bill Maher who suggested that if the Republicans wanted to change the rules for Arnie, W again, or whoever, we should be able to run Bill Clinton again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
60. I think the W Still President stickers indicate that they love go gloat
I've basically determined the level of an asshole somebody is based on the type of sticker they have on their car...

Bush/Cheney '04 - Asshole

W '04 - Big Asshole

W The President - Huge Asshole

W Still The President - Supreme Asshole

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #60
75. Bushies have been putting stickers on their cars
ever since the election. I notice more after the election than before. It's a response to Kerry supporters, including me, leaving all of our pro-Kerry and anti-Bush stickers on.
I'm happy to know we've upset them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. I encourage this kind of idiocy among my RW idiot acquaintances
Oh yeah, good ol' George, right there in '08, let's go baby let's go.

Because the more they hitch their wagon to Georgie's star, the more disappointed they will be when they have to "settle" for some other jackass like Frist or whatever.

The cult of personality works both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. See the shirts?
One says "Thank me, I voted for Bush"

Imagine anyone still thinking they did a good thing(though that one was at a reduced price).

I don't know how to post a picture yet, but this page http://www.cafepress.com/progopgear.15131640
has a shirt that says:
"You're Either With Us or Against Us
With a map of the red and blue states, then under that a line the key: red square=with us, blue = against us.

Gee, do you think they don't like us?

I would have trouble not reacting to people in those shirts. Thank them? I can't even figure out how to forgive them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good 'ol George wasn't "elected" in 2000 -- he was "placed" by the
Edited on Sun May-29-05 05:32 PM by KaliTracy
Supreme court -- although I've yet to hear a Republican say that...

They have a bunch of W'05 gear too.... what... are they afraid he's going to be impeached or something??



too funny! :evilgrin:

edit: link http://www.cafepress.com/progopgear/473867
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Amend the Constitution
to ban Gay Marriage. Amend the Constitution so AHnorld can run for President. Amend, Amend, Amend. It wouldn't surprise me if they wanted to amend it to let the Chimp run again. Just change all the rules to get your way. My way or the Highway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. would they have to amend if he was appointed in 2000? well, ok, probably,
but I would hope that with the past couple of months of trying to force things through (Shiavo, etc.), that those Republicans who still have half of a brain would realize how crazy that would be....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You just described the right-wing philosophy
If what they want is unconstitutional, they'll just amend it. If they don't like the courts' decisions, they will just stack them with right-wing extremists. They are not satisfied with controlling all branches of government. They want absolute power with no opposition and no checks and balances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
48. Hey -
It's just an old piece of paper...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. And no self-righteous theo-con woman is going to wear that
sexy thong, anyway. That probably would be blaphemous to fundies who believe sex is only about procreation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaliTracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. i bet brittany spears has one.....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Oops, I thought it was a jock strap!
An especially appropriate place for a picture of a ____!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
56. You mean "Appointed"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Remember the Repub who sued over that logo?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=680572

Claimed they stole his idea.. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'm not surprised. With repukes, it's all about the money they think they
deserve. All about money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. My question is
how can you copy-write the letter "W" and the numbers 04? :shrug: How ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. It's possible. Design copyrights are weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. That or they're just really really dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Why does it have to be one or the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. That might as well say. MARTIAL LAW 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Probably tongue in cheek, to
"tweak liberals."

It's worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. Well they want to change Senate rules....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
discopants Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. "W" stands for Wes
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
33. I saw a W 2008 Emperor bumpersticker! :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
35. This is the second time I've seen a cafe press store used to imply...
...that there's a big organization out there and that the posters uncovered its intentions.

ANYONE can start a cafe press store and you can make designes with software that is already on 99% of the computers sold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrwellwasRight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. I'm not sure anyone meant to imply that some grand conspiracy

was uncovered.

I noticed a year or two ago that slogans of all types are sold on cafepress.com

However, I did want to make the comment that it might behoove us to consider doing business with a more partisan company. Partisan on the left, that is.

I had that thought for a while but never posted it. I don't see anything wromg with giving our business to those who believe what we do instead of just to companies who believe in the almighty dollar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. What company are you talking about? These are just average people...
...putting up these cafepress stores.

Cafepress is a great company which shifts power down to people, regardless of how those people use their power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mitt Chovick Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
42. Well since he wasn't elected in 2000....
he wouldn't be term limited out yet.

- Scary thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #42
61. He was inaugurated, though...
The constitution says nothing about being elected to two terms, just being inaugurated to two terms.

Hence, President Gore could be re-elected twice, since he never served his first term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mitt Chovick Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Ahh, good point
but I should have used some kind of sarcasm notation on my previous post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. I knew it was sarcastic
But I go nuts at the thought of 4 more years of King George even if it is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mitt Chovick Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. It is a thought too horrible to contemplate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
73. Geezus, don't give them any ideas!
He wasn't elected at all in 2000 and only fraudulently in 2004, so technically, he was never elected at all, which leaves him open for 8 more years. And if the 'Pukes thought that argument would work, they would use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sokrates Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. Come on. It's a joke.
And a moderately funny one at that. No need to be frightened at every little thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. Lots of us thought that the lead-in to the Iraq war
was a big bluff, verging on a joke. There was no reason for fighting such a war that stood up to real political or moral scrutiny, in fact fighting Iraq was so utterly ridiculous that Bush couldn't possibly be serious.

Right?

No.

I put nothing past these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
44. The Lord's anointed one...
...doesn't lose that status just because some man-made Constitutional alarm clock goes off.

W was sent by God as a special dispensation in our hour of greatest crisis, and until the crisis is over, it would be blasphemy to suggest another leader, or should I say Leader.

So, until America is liberated once and for all from the twin scourges of oral sex and the Democratic Party, W'08 it is.

Remember the First Crusade? Deus lo vult. God wants it.

(Do I get the gig with Fox News? Huh? Huh? How'd I do, Mr. Ailes?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
45. They mean Laura Welch Bush--her maiden name is Welch, people.
Be afraid. Be VERY Afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. yup. Just what we need...
new puppet, same strings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cquik18 Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. I've heard that too...
...Laura Bush may get tapped to run for Prez in 2008...I wonder what all those "red-blooded 'Murkins" are going to do...do they vote for a WOMAN to be president, especially considering how much they hate Hillary Clinton... And what if Laura taps Colin Powell to be her running mate-or Condoleeza Rice? Do the red-state rednecks vote for a woman AND a DARKIE to lead them? So many heads would explode it'd look like a "Scanners" film convention!

Personally, I'd love to see Hillary and Laura tee it up...loser has to get groped by Governator Musclehead! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. I don't think she's interested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #53
74. Wow, a Presidential election where neither candidate is qualified?
Think we could get Barbara Boxer to run as a Green?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
46. I'd vote for Bill Clinton again in a heartbeat.
So, I hope they change the law. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
49. "So this is how freedom ends. To thunderous applause."
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. and with big, happy, flag-waving buttons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cquik18 Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. ..and those "Support the Troops" magnets on their SUV's...
...you know, the ones that are MADE IN CHINA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
55. Okay, what's NEIL's middle name
Just covering all the bases.

Laura's middle name?

Barbara's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. Uh Oh! I googled Neil. His nickname is Wanker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Nickname? I thought that's what he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
58. The W stands for Laura's middle name Welch
The want to run Laura against Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
68. It's most likely a joke...
Don't let this freak you out. I think they just like messing with people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
69. Guess who Lynn Cheney is supporting of '08
Pickles! Per her weekend Faux interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #69
70. I shuddered when I read that!
Be afraid, be very afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. Wouldn't that interfere with her acting career?

NEW YORK CITY (IWR News Parody) - Conservative news magnate and Fox Television Network owner Rupert Murdoch announced today that First Lady Laura Bush has agreed to play Terri Schiavo in new Fox TV movie scheduled to air in the 2006 Fall season. "Roger Ailes tells me we could pick another 30 seats in the House if we show this movie a week before the general election," said Murdock to reporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
77. Is Gonzales writing another opinion?
This one saying that the 22nd Amemndment doesn't apply to President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC