Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 01:42 PM by Old and In the Way
AWOL on his personal military commitment AWOL on his Harkin Director fiduciary responsibility AWOL on the Kyoto Protocols AWOL on protecting the food supply AWOL on the California energy scam AWOL on protecting the budget surplus AWOL on progressive taxation AWOL on implementing Hart-Rudman AWOL on 9/11 AWOL on the 9/11 investigation AWOL on Iraqi evidence of WMD AWOL on the CIA Plame investigation AWOL on Health Insurance AWOL on FCC regulations AWOL on jobs
AWOL on protecting the publics' interests Reporting for Duty to defend the corporate agenda.
Clark did not bring up the Deserter issue and has not investigated the matter. How could he make a statement either way other than to defend the right of any who has looked into the issue and believes Bush was in fact AWOL or even a Deserter?
BTW, Kerry will be labeled too Massachusetts Liberal for the South just watch.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.