|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:29 PM Original message |
Are we being hoodwinked by the "electability" issue ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. why are you saying this now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Always late.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmaier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think that electibility is a very big concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Why "should" we believe it ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Yes, you should have the right to believe whatever you want.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. thanks, had me worried for a minute there Kentuk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Yes, I think Edwards would be one of those that are "electable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. Only before January - when the people became involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. I firmly believe as much as I've ever beieved anything in my life that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. you may be right about Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Outvoicer (667 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. No ... we are seriously concerned about removing Bush ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. absolutely, eventually the media will tout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yes, I think so......."Electability over Principle?......because the Media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
12. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. Right now, damn near anybody could beat Shrub |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Polemonium (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Exactly who ever your for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
overground1 (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. in a word, "yes". The objective is to keep us off balance, 2nd guessing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
16. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. i think it is the inevitable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
20. Why----We *Don't* Want to be "Electible"??????? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9119495 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
21. I've been saying our four could beat Bush for a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
22. The elephant in the room. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. We're definitely being "manipulated." Not, sure how it's going to work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
24. Yes they are. The only candidate that has really been *tested* in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
25. But, in the end, the people may "hoodwink" the media.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-04 12:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Kinda like Iowa, huh? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheilaT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-04 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
27. For what my opinion is worth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enjolras (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-04 02:02 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-04 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
29. This race ain't about electability... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-04 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
30. Everyone should vote for their personal choice, absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC