Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Republican piece of malarkey....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 10:53 AM
Original message
Another Republican piece of malarkey....
Some lady called into C-SPAN this AM and was complaining about what a mess Clinton left the military. Any sane person would have to admit that the military is in worse shape today than when Bush came into office. The military is in worse shape today than when it went into Afghanistan, for example. Why? It's because of George W Bush - not William J Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. always the same line from them
and even though its bunk, it's the dems achilles heel. The bad thing is too many dems think taking the repub positions in these matters is the answer to not be seen as weak on defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Heard that
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 11:00 AM by StClone
It didn't help however that the Deaniac before her was breathlessly loosing her grip. I think point by point comparing Bush to Clinton is a losing proposition for any GOPer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton Good. Clinton Bad. Clinton Good. Clinton Bad
I thought the latest rational for the Iraq invasion was that Clinton supported "regime change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Gee, Clinton's military sure did fine in Afghanistan didn't they?
Well except for the fact that the Bush appointed strategists didn't plan for shit, but the soldiers did mighty well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xrepub Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. bush lucky
The military that crushed the Iraqis so easily was developed during Clinton's administration. It had not been changed before the invasion. The disheartened military of today is the result of the disasterous policies of the shrub. It's hard to see how any honest person could state otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush has taken the Clinton military and tore it down....
He hasn't built it up.....and he has had time to do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, and the military loves Bush so much that they just can't wait
to get out.

Except that the W administration is making them stay.

I guess that all those "good" soldiers left when Clinton took office (remember? they were protesting "don't ask, don't tell"), and came back after Bush took office.

I guess that's why the US has lost more miliatry lives in Bush's illegal war than all of the military conflicts combined under Clinton.

These people can't keep their lies straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC