Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It was all about the Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:27 AM
Original message
It was all about the Supreme Court
That was my point during the entire '04 campaign. (And the '00 as well.)

My worst fears have come to fruition. Our American people are fucked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. and no one cared
look at the voter turnout both in 2000 and 2004

sometimes we have to hit the bottom before we realize what we have lost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. DU was too busy promoting the nonsense that there's "NO DIFFERENCE"
between Dems and Repugs, between Kerry and Bush, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Excuse me?
I must have missed that, I never heard anyone here say such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Plenty of suckers were saying it.
That's all I'll say, lest I begin a flame war..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well I only came here after November, but
there are plenty of people posting here now that say that, and some of them have indicated that their positions haven't changed. It may have been somewhat muted then (relative to now) but I find it hard to believe all of those folks kept their keyboards quiet before the election.

I have spent the morning on another site which seems to be a darling of the "left", looking at articles they put out in the last couple of weeks of October 2004, that trashed Kerry and said people should vote for Nader. (I just searched for "John Roberts" on that site and there were only a very few articles. Hmmm....seems like they don't want to talk much about the Supreme Court...)

I sure hope it wasn't like that here on DU in October 2004, but it's easy for a newbie like me to believe that it could have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. The S.C. will still matter in 2008.
And perhaps *'s loss of political capital will limit how bad his nominees can be, if some R senators get cold feet. But, I'm afraid that hope is a little dim.

All we can plan on is starting to take it back in 2008. Let's hope the rest (of the good guys at least) stay healthy:

John Paul Stevens Born: April 20, 1920

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Born: March 15, 1933

Anthony Kennedy Born: July 23, 1936

Stephen G. Breyer Born: August 15, 1938

David H. Souter Born: September 17, 1939
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfalchion Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. any actuaries around?
It can still get worse.

Stevens is 84 and Ginsburg has colon cancer.

We have to plan for the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Ack. I knew there was a concern with Ginsburg but
I didn't know it was cancer. I'm sorry to hear that (Ok I prob'ly heard before and forgot), not just for the SC aspect but of course it is sad when someone has cancer. (Bucking the apparent trend at DU, I was sorry about it for Rehnquist too.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfalchion Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. It's been 6 years...
so she's probably OK.
___________________________________________________________________
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ats/Oct1/

Healthy Lifestyles and Regular Screenings Would Cut US Colon Cancer Morbidity in Half

Colon cancer has been news recently. This summer, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sought treatment for abdominal distress and was diagnosed with colon cancer. Ginsburg had surgery in September in an attempt to remove the cancer.

Overall, 62% of Americans diagnosed with colon cancer live at least five years post-diagnosis, still approximately 48,000 people die each year from this cancer. Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the country.

The good news: More than half of colon cancers can be prevented through lifestyle changes and routine

--more--
_______________________________
If you're >50, let this be a wake-up call to get your poop chute checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. She's been in remission since 1999.
I remember because that scumbag Pat Robertson was praying for God to off the more liberal justices..

http://paperfrog.com/blog/archives/000109.php

If Justices Stevens and Ginsburg can hold-on for another three years, so too can I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yep. Unfortunately
the greens in florida in 2000 were too stupid to understand that. They gave us bush and a conservative extremist supreme court that will be around for decades.

Thanks guys.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Which will do more environmental destruction than
almost anything Congress could do on its own (if held in check by a rational Supreme Court).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. inflammatory
let's not foget "Jews for Buchanon", southern Dems voting for Bush, a corrupt elections system, and a supreme court firmly in the Bush's pockets.

The only reason I can see for this post is to start a flame war. It is counter-productive, dated, and serves only to divide. Plus it ignores a lot of blame that could be placed elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. oh please
The Democrats have been right there along the Republicans voting through much of the legislation that's been pushed down our throats over the past few years.... most notably the Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And this justifies an entire chorus line of Scalias on the Supreme Court.
Note taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. were you TRYING to miss the point?
This is not the Greens' fault. It's the fault of the election fraud, Supreme Court, Republicans AND Democrats. Throwing blame on the Greens just distracts people from the complicity most Democrats have shown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. And magically..
in your list of where the fault lies, the Greens escape unscathed.

"It's the fault of the election fraud, Supreme Court, Republicans AND Democrats."

Yup. Everyone you've listed shares some of the blame, I agree. But the Greens? Naaah.. they're perfect. Any claim that they should've known better is poppycock, right?

Uh-huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Quite right. We've been sold out by the Democrats.

I have been a registered Democrat since 1968.

I am now a disillusioned Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. It was the whines of "I don't know if I can vote for Kerry {Gore}..."
"He's just not _________ enough for me, I don't think I can vote for him" -- those were aggravating in the extreme. :grr:

Every time I saw one of those threads, I would invariably post, "The judges, the judges, the judges."

Well, now, here we are. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Exactly!
I remember telling a group of people that the election is important for three reasons...the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court. This will have a bearing on us, our children, and our children's children.

Some listened...most didn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. I supported all of them, all the Dems, going back to 1968,

before which I was too young to vote. Voted Democratic, gave money to Dems, especially to Kerry last year, though I preferred Kucinich by far.

And what hath it benefited me?

NAFTA. WTO. With Bill Clinton's blessing.

Iraq, CAFTA, the PATRIOT Act, with the blessing of most "Democrats" in the Senate and House.

And the Dems won't stand up to fight Bush's nominees to SCOTUS, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC