Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Katrina bumped Iraq as the#1 issue for the 06 elections?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 11:46 AM
Original message
Has Katrina bumped Iraq as the#1 issue for the 06 elections?
If so, what will this mean in terms of the way campaigns are run and who will win them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't see it as sequential....more cumulative and related
Lack of responsibility, accountability and credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. It caused Rick Santorum to dig the grave of his political future even
deeper (saying that those who did not evacuate should face penalties). Hopefully, his opponent(s) in PA are taking notes for next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Taking notes and speaking out in the press:
Sen. Rick Santorum said in a weekend interview that people who do not heed evacuation warnings in the future may need to be penalized. But the Pennsylvania Republican yesterday clarified his remarks, saying he did not mean people who lack cars or other resources.

His remarks were sharply criticized by the campaign of Democrat Bob Casey Jr., who is seeking to unseat Santorum, the No. 3 GOP leader in the Senate. "At face value show an incredible amount of insensitivity to the Gulf Coast," said Jay Reiff, Casey's campaign manager. "What exactly does Senator Santorum mean by imposing penalties on people who often times had no transportation and no place to go?"

In a weekend interview with Pittsburgh's WTAE-TV about the victims of Hurricane Katrina, Santorum said: "I mean, you have people who don't heed those warnings and then put people at risk as a result of not heeding those warnings. There may be a need to look at tougher penalties on those who decide to ride it out and understand that there are consequences to not leaving."


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05250/566844.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. No, it's part of a triple-whammy - Shrub's axis of his own personal evil:
9/11 - Iraq - Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. I do not believe Katrina has replaced Iraq as the # 1 issue
for two reasons:

(1) In so far as they illustrate the Bush Administration's incompetence, refusal to deal with realities instead of appearances, lack of concern for people other than the privileged few, cronyism and corruption, and abuse of anyone who tries to tell the truth or act honorably they are cumulative rather than in competition with each each other.

(2) Katrina itself has passed; there is still the aftermath, and it looks pretty gruesome, but the storm itself has gone. The war in Iraq continues, and it doesn't appear to be getting any better. It will not pass away naturally as did Katrina. It will continue to get worse until someone in authority unites decency, intelligence, and a respect for the opinions of others, ("a decent respect for the opinions of mankind") as necessary elements in dealing with the issues at hand.

I see no indication that anyone in the Bush Administration is capable of decency, intelligence, and "a decent respect for the opinions of mankind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Quite possibly , especially in the short term
The general public, not us politics mavens, almost always care more about immediate issues here at home rather than international affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC