Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transcript of Michael Brown's Confirmation Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:25 AM
Original message
Transcript of Michael Brown's Confirmation Hearing
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 09:28 AM by Roland99
http://www.voluntarytrade.org/downloads/Brown_ConfirmHrg.pdf (PDF format)


Enjoy.




BTW, does anyone know the vote count for Brown's confirmation on Aug. 1, 2002? I can't find it. Seems others can't, either:

http://blog.mises.org/blog/archives/004054.asp

I can't find even a report of what the vote was on the nomination as under-secretary. Senate site seemingly has the vote on every other confirmation ever, but not his one. Does anyone know when and what the vote was?

Posted by: jcb at September 6, 2005 03:58 PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I assumed there was no senate confirmation since FEMA was
a part of Homeland Security...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He was confirmed on Aug. 1, 2002 but I can't find any vote information
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 09:39 AM by Roland99
I also haven't had time to pore over that document to see what other lies might be in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I know he was confirmed somehow but there may have not been
a vote -- I vaguely remember hearing something along these lines...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read somewhere it was a voice vote.
May not be a count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Wouldn't there still be a record of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not always.
At least that is my understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not even in the Congressional record?
I didn't try searching there.


Hmm...should at least be a news article somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. This is all I found
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r107:15:./temp/~r107Ppit8I::

Executive nominations confirmed by the Senate August 1, 2002:

<...>

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Michael D. Brown, of Colorado, to be Deputy Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.


Along with a bazillion others. Just a rubber-stamp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. yet another reason that the notion that "Bush should be able . . .
to appoint whomever he wants" is horseshit . . . the Democrats have consistently given Bush appointees a pass with little or no scrutiny based on the supposition that a president should be able to appoint his own people without interference from the opposition . . . and look where it's gotten us . . .

every Bush appointment from here on out should be scrutinized with a fine tooth comb . . . including that of Chief Justice . . . and if the appointees aren't qualified, they should be rejected . . . having high government officials actually who are actually qualified to do the jobs they're appointed to is simply too important to leave it to political cronyism . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. YES! Thank you!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC