|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 11:57 AM Original message |
What if Roberts just outright lies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seansky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. What do you mean IF... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. You've got that right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
2. That's the entire BushCo MO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. Couldn't he be indicted for lying to Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Lying to congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shoelace414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. impeachment is the only recourse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Can they actually be impeached? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formerrepuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
6. Clarence Thomas lied- and everyone knows it....so why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. I don't think he will vote to overturn Roe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Supreme Court doesn't need to overturn Roe v. Wade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I guess the larger issue I'm trying to get at is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enlightenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. According to the US Constitution, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
11. The Bush administration shopped Roberts to the fundies for a year, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. Republicans don't want R v W overturn... They need this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC