Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DSM Resolutions of Inquiry Defeated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 09:44 PM
Original message
DSM Resolutions of Inquiry Defeated
http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000242.htm

Blogged by JC on 09.15.05 @ 07:43 PM ET

DSM Resolutions of Inquiry Defeated

We lost three more votes on getting Congress to investigate Bush scandals, but we attained a bit more accountability -- by forcing GOP Members to go on record. This time the House International Relations Committee rejected our Resolutions of Inquiry -- along largely party line votes -- asking the Administration to turn over evidence of pre-war agreements between the U.S. and U.K. My freind Joe Crowley has a good post on this over at TPM Cafe (btw, it is great to see other Democrats using the Web to highlight Bush and GOP abuses).

I will continue to press the Administration via FOIA requests and will continue my own ongoing investigation into Downing Street.

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/9/14/175347/011

Downing Street Secrecy

By Rep. Joseph Crowley
From: TPMCafe Special Guests
Sep 14, 2005 -- 07:34:37 PM EST

On a day when more than 150 people were killed in Iraq, the White House was given a free pass to continue hiding information in regard to the Downing Street Memo. The Memo, which was leaked to reporters a few months ago, outlines the specific concerns the British government has in regard to the post-Iraq planning of the United States. The tragedy is that the American public will never know what really happened because this decision was made during a meeting of the International Relations Committee when members voted along largely partisan lines to kill three pieces of legislation that would have required the White House to release the documents that led to the Downing Street Memo.

I joined many of my colleagues Democrats and Republicans in voting for the War in Iraq almost two years ago. I have done my best to support what I can of the agenda, but I also recognize the importance of questioning the Administration when we are in a state of chaos.
It is important to be forthcoming that Congress and the American people were misled about the reasons to invade Iraq by the President and his Administration. It is also important to note that if the British government had doubts about post-Iraq planning, clearly there were holes in the strategy.

As was the case after September 11th and will be the case following Katrina, it is impossible to move forward without looking at past mistakes. The constant cover-ups and unwillingness to share information does nothing to help the issue of creating stability in Iraq. With all we have learned over the past two years the President and his team did not take into account the risks of the post invasion and the need for diplomacy instead of the go it alone approach.

It is time for the President to do something he has yet to do, which is to stand up in front of the country to tell the truth and finally provide a transparent and fully accountable disclosure of the information that led us to this war and the deaths of more than 1800 US troops, countless Iraqi citizens and the aid and humanitarian workers trying to bring basic services to the people of Iraq. What members of Congress need to do is hold this Administration accountable and take back our oversight role. The American public needs to know that these fights are being fought, but that we will not know the truth until partisanship can be put aside in favor of the best interests of the American people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. "...stand up in front of the country to tell the truth " He did on NOLA:)
It's all his fault, period. He won't on Iraq. He'll be toast if he does. No reason not to push him thought. I loved the vote. Put them on record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ho hum, aren't we complacent?
DSM is the crack in BushCo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC