Judge bars release of Ghraib photo's again

babsbunny

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 02:46 PM
Original message

Judge bars release of Ghraib photo's again

Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 02:47 PM by babsbunny

even the one's already made public. www.rawstory.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

endarkenment

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message

1. This is not the ACLU lawsuit case.

This is the unfortunate Ms. England's case, where she gets to go to jail for the Rumsfeld/Gonzales/Bush torture them all policy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

indepat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message

2. FOIA done been revoked?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

tom_paine

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. Revoked in the Bushevik way...revoked in all but the hollow shell

In other words, they don't come out and SAY "we're revoking FOIA" or "the Bill of Rights is hereby revoked", but the reality is that these items, and so many others which still remain as hollow meaningless shells, are gone.

Imperial Amerika is ruled by Imperial Will and THE PARTY. All else is meaningless and hollowed out.

For the rubes, you know. They (we) are so married to the idea of being "free".

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

indepat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #3

5. The handwriting has long been on the wall for all to see but constant lies

Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 03:31 PM by indepat

keep it glossed over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Chipper Chat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message

4. What is a photo's again?

Wasn't aware a photo could own anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

jilln

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4

6. It's friends with the "one's" in the body of the message...

and the "channel's" my coworker watches, and the "thank's" I got in a job application for a proofreader...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Chipper Chat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-20-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. Ha ha ha - great reply.

Naturally, I don't mean to belittle the orig poster, but I finally got up the nerve to be a smartass and comment on the unneccessary 's peeps in here use. Surely we wouldn't want to be hypocrits and smite freepers for bad puctuation when there are splinters ('s) in our own eyes.
Game over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed May 01st 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.