Kerry tells 'influence peddlers' in Washington: 'We're coming'

Buh-bye Smirk, John Kerry is going to send your sorry self back to Crawford! Better enjoy it. Next stop is Leavenworth, after an honest Attorney General gets done prosecuting you and Sneer!

Kerry tells 'influence peddlers' in Washington: 'We're coming'

EXCERPT...

With his second victory in as many weeks, a confident Kerry acted like a man who wanted to be the new sheriff in Washington.

"I have a message for the influence peddlers, for the polluters, the HMOs, the big drug companies that get in the way, the big oil and the special interests -- who now call the White House their home," Kerry said. "We're coming. You're going. And don't let the door hit you on the way out."

SNIP...

"I make this pledge to you tonight: I have spent my whole life fighting for what I think is right and against powerful special interests, and I have only just begun the fight," he said.

SNIP...

"In the hardest moments of the past month, I depended on the same band of brothers that I depended on some 30 years ago. We're a little older, and a little grayer, but I'll tell you this -- we still know how to fight for our country."

CONTINUED...

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/27/elec04.prez.kerry/

SNARF.

Later.

RJS

But I still like it. No offense.

Well, it's mine now, you can't have it!

SNARF. ;)

Later.

RJS

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Please prove it.

Any proof?

.

That is combined with an already very unimpressive legislative record.

Especially without any proof...

You don't want a Senator who negotiates peaceful turnovers in Philippines and Cambodia?

You don't want a Senator who normalized relations with Vietnam?

You don't want a Senator who advocated for gays to serve openly in the military?

You don't want a Senator who drafted the Hate Crimes bill?

You don't want a Senator who worked on Kyoto Protocol for 10 years?

Kerry WAS NOT INVOLVED with the transfer of power in the Philippines. I know because my wife is from the Philippines, studied the whole thing in school, and SHE'S NEVER HEARD OF THE GUY!

She was yelling at the TV when she heard him make that claim-- Richard Lugar had a much larger part in the transfer...

Did you miss that?

he seems to do more of it than the others do.

This is an Edwards theme.

But let's all face facts: successfully coopting your opponents message is one of the hallmarks of the winning politician.

You gotta give Kerry credit for recognizing the strength of both Dean's and Edwards message. The question is, does he really believe it? Does Edwards?

I believe Dean means it. I want to think Edwards means it, but it he really ready to propose a $16 hour minimum wage (what it would take for a single mother of two to stay above the poverty line in North Dakota)?

Personally, I don't want the race over too soon. If Kerry is unstoppable, I want Dean and Edwards and Kucinich in it for as long as possible. If Kerry ends up the nominee, we need him so far into out message that he has to stand by it, run on it, and deliver it.

And at the end of the day, that's all I want out of my party come November.

I suggest you learn about his real record.

www.johnkerry.com

nudge nudge wink wink

Never has.

Is Kerry now a comedian?

Now how does a person rack up the most liberal record if they are "one of them" as you now claim?

What charge are you going to settle on, that he is the most liberal, or that he is a corporatist?

I don't get it.

but I think if he wins we will have more of the same.

Please explain...

compromise and corporate dominance, bad tax policy, gridlock, empty rhetoric, government of by and for the powerful and well-connected... more of the same.

is full of it. He's a pacman and this is just hot air. Again, Kerry says what people want to hear, not what he truly believes. I have little faith in Kerry to carry out these reforms, he simply morphs into every situation as if he's always been there.

amazing...

in getting elected, not much more. If Kerry is our nominee I wouldn't put much faith in him reforming all of the practices he's railing against now. That's my opinion. I've always viewed Kerry as a pandering type, all form and no substance. Again, that's just my opinion. You're entitled to your's as well.

Bush is a cake eater sissy.

Until the country realizes it and sees through his "down-home" facade, we are screwed.

He's a total sissy.

No real man would lie about going to war.

He's a sissy. I don't vote for sissies.

On to the rest of the nation.

for actually raising taxes on the rich (and not just repealing the Bush cuts).

All we get from Kerry is the same old spiel. He never really offers to people anything except repealing the tax cuts for the rich. On the other hand, Clark and Lieberman are offering to actually RAISE income taxes on the rich, and Edwards is offering to raise taxes on unearned income.

Clark, Lieberman and Edwards; plans really suck in comparison to what we really need, but it is better than what Kerry offers, which is basically just empty rhetoric, however polished it might be.

Citizen Soldier Fund
Affiliate: JOHN KERRY (D)

Top Industries

Cycle: 2002 All Cycles*
Rank
>Industry
Total
Hard Money
Soft Money

1
Lawyers/Law Firms
$365,700
$91,000
$274,700

2
Real Estate
$265,472
$65,472
$200,000

3
Misc Finance
$127,250
$10,250
$117,000

4
Computers/Internet
$126,000
$51,000
$75,000

5
Securities & Investment
$97,000
$38,000
$59,000

6
Telecom Services & Equipment
$90,500
$12,000
$78,500

http://www.opensecrets.org/presidential/leadpac_ind.asp?id=N00000245&cycle=2002

corporate pac money.

So that's not special interest money? Ever hear of bundling?

this is Kerry's (and our) only hope.

They will try to paint Kerry as a Benedict Arnold traitor for his participation in VVAW.
They will try to paint him as a waffler with no true beliefs of his own.
They will try to paint him as just another cheap political opportunist.
Well call him what you want, but he has stood up for liberal ideals for 35 years now. But more importantly, he has been fighting for his country. Whether it was enlisting in the Navy to serve, or coming back to fight to end an unjust war, the bottom line is he has served with honor. And he is a REAL THREAT to the status quo.

So let's band together, and show that we care more about our country than our party.
Let us band together and perhaps even scare Bush and Cheney to death before we cast a vote.
Let us let them know we are coming and the party is over.
This fight is for all the good people- all the people John Kerry has been fighting for his whole life.

"And he is a REAL THREAT to the status quo."

-The longtime senator from Mass is a threat to the status quo, give me a break.

He was a DEMOCRAT of the first rank. The guy was called the "Counsel to Presidents." From FDR to Jimmy Carter.

For Truman, Clifford helped draft the legislation that created the CIA and the National Security state. That led to the Secret Government-Big Business-Mafia-NAZIs we call the BFEE.

Clifford was the power broker who fronted for BCCI, the crooked Pakistani bank used by the BFEE to bribe politicians and move money for the connected from Jackson Stephens to George W Bush, build the Pakistani bomb, peddle drugs, launder money, pay terrorists of the right and left, from Abu Nidhal to Ollie North.

Anyway. Kerry busted the guy and he busted BCCI. As President, Kerry would bust the BFEE.

And he is not a fighter in the political sense.

His stances on war are almost the EXACT OPPOSITE of many if not most Democrats:

* Declared Vietnam war wrong, THEN fought in it (presumably killing people)

* VOTED AGAINST GULF WAR I

* Voted for IWR (against the Democratic base, and most of world opinion)

He went to fight in it, THEN protested it. He has said that within weeks, he realized what a malicious war it was, with Americans bombing villages, barking Vietnam soldiers around, acting like they run the country... It's a very deceitful charge.

Kerry was down to, what, 11 percent in NH a month ago? He fought back, don't you think.

And, so what if his stance is at odds with someone elses?

The FACTs are these:

Kerry fought in Vietnam FIRST, where he showed his mettle under fire. When he returned home, he was among the FIRST to oppose the war among the war's heroes.

Yes, Kerry voted against Gulf War 1. Why? Because it was a BFEE set-up. GOOGLE "April Glaspie" and "Saddam Hussein" and learn why.

Kerry voted to PROTECT America after 9-11. BTW: How do you define "Democratic base?" What Karl Rove says? Clinton and the Democratic establishment wanted Saddam out in 1998.

A prowar gun-grabbing Eastern Establishment Bonesman is a recipe for disaster.

He's got nearly all the democratic insiders backing him.

He is the ultimate insider in this race, and most of those kids backing Dean, a lot of those diverse people backing Clark will not transfer their support to Kerry, because these are people looking for meaningful channge. A longtime Senator who has been a part of the system for longer than a lot of the Deaniacs have been alove will not appeal to them.

A big lost opportunity if that's how it goes down.

From the firefighters union to the veterans to women to those now in government service to my autoworker buddies to ...

Yes. You get the picture! Sen. Kerry has the "democratic insiders" backing his candidacy.

Go John Kerry!

Did anyone ever provide any links about John Kerry "stealing" the Iowa caucus from Dr. Dean?

There were deals worked out...the very nature of a caucus guarantees that. Gephardt threw his supporters to Kerry (will be interesting to see what he got out of the deal). Kucinich threw his to Edwards (so much for Mr. Integrity). It's no secret that the power structure in the Democratic Party was threatened by someone who could generate the kind of fundraising and support OUTSIDE of their influence that Dean was doing and so he had to be stopped. None of this is news... it's been discussed repeatedly on DU.