Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Apparently Mulling Criminal Conspiracy Charges Vs. Libby, Rove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:25 AM
Original message
Fitzgerald Apparently Mulling Criminal Conspiracy Charges Vs. Libby, Rove
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 12:27 AM by JABBS
As his investigaiton into the unmasking of CIA operative Valerie Plame concludes, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is apparently mulling charges of a criminal conspiracy perpetrated by senior Bush Administration officials, most likely including I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Karl Rove.

The Washington Post, in a story in today's issue, said Fitzgerald may take this tact because he lacks evidence to prove a violation of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, which he first set out to investigate. To prove a violation of the act, Fitzgerald would have to show that government officials knew an operative had covert status and intentionally leaked the operative's identity.

According to lawyers who spoke to the Post on the condition of anonymity, Fitzgerald is apparently considering the alternative, which may be easier to prove.

Under this legal tactic, Fitzgerald would attempt to establish that at least two or more officials (conceivably, Libby and Rove) agreed to take affirmative steps to discredit and retaliate against Plame's husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, and leak sensitive government information about his wife. To prove a criminal conspiracy, the actions need not have been criminal, but conspirators must have had a criminal purpose.

While conspiracy cases are viewed by criminal prosecutors as simpler to bring than more straightforward criminal charges, they are also trickier to sell to juries. "That would arguably be a close call for a prosecutor, but it could be tried," a veteran Washington criminal attorney with longtime experience in national security cases told the Post.

The grand jury is scheduled to expire Oct. 28, and lawyers in the case told the <em>Post</em> that Fitzgerald could signal his intentions as early as this week.

Fitzgerald is investigating whether anyone illegally disclosed Plame's name or undercover CIA job in retaliation against Wilson. In a 2003 op-ed piece in the New York Times, Wilson accused the White House of using "twisted" intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq.

***

This item first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. If he rings me up, I'll help him decide.
NAIL the sonofabitch. And his asshole boss, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Knocking on wood...
If I were you I would delete that post. We don't want to jinx things. Haven't we had enough door slams over the last 5 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm praying real hard for this to happen
This would be the ultimate Christmas gift and an early one too.

PLEASE...PLEASE...PLEASE!!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't thing anybody ex[ected Fitz to prosecute the IIp Act.
I don't totally agree with this article either. I think many charges are going to be perjury and obstruction of justice. Maybe one or two non-indicted co-conspirator charges.

This has been a very long investigation. Fitz isn't giving up easily.

Next week, I bet!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's no longer a matter of if
but when.

I assume W and and the gang are huddled up at Camp David this weekend trying to figure out what to pull next to save their sorry asses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. OK...but what about....
The actual espionage codes, The US Codes 18 793/794? citizenspook on his blog, explains that Fitz will never get a conviction under the IIPA, because just as you wrote the Wash Po article states "that he lacks evidence to prove a violation of the IIPA occurred"...but if the proper US Codes of Justice were used...Fitz has everything he needs to convict...so why are the proper codes being ignored, in favor of using the IIPA?
another case of smoke and mirrors? IMO, anyone who was a party to outing her, is guilty of treason...no ands, ifs, or buts...
windbreeze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Because the treason goes all the way to the top


and Fitzgerald knows how important doing this case right is.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. I hope indictments come down AFTER Chimpy announces Court Nominee
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 11:36 AM by npincus
If the CHIMP were CONSIDERING nominating a conservative-leaning-moderate or even a "moderate" person to replace O'Connor, he would take a SHARP RIGHT if indictments were to come down first... he would badly need the distraction of a bloody, partisan battle to dilute the media feeding frenzy that could follow. Our MSM would be only too willing to focus on "those partisan Democrats" than shine a light on the rats infesting the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. If Judas Maximus knows Bush/Cheney were involved ...
it is a lead pipe cinch that Fitzgerald does as well. I certainly hope he's contemplating more than those two shit-smears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC