Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some info on Harriet Miers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:32 AM
Original message
Some info on Harriet Miers
More cronyism, and another very thinly veiled attempt to get a good buddy on the SC before indictments come down on Plame.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/20/AR2005062001161.html

Ask White House counsel Harriet Miers when she first met George W. Bush, and she is less than specific. "I met him on a variety of occasions over the course of time," she replied recently, explaining their long-ago encounters in the social and power corridors of Texas. "But not in a memorable way."

Ask her what it was like to be the first woman elected president of the Texas Bar Association, and she invokes not gender, but the geographic rivalry that frequently underlies bar elections in the state. "It was a very vigorous campaign against a lawyer from Houston," said Miers, who is from Dallas.

Ask what motivated her to seek election to the Dallas City Council in the late 1980s, she says only: "I was asked to run." Ask why she bowed out after one term, and she is only a bit more expansive. The structure of the council had changed, she explains, converting her citywide seat into one representing one district. That did not suit her interest, so she moved on. "It was a natural progression," she said.

Miers's reticence is not to be mistaken for a lack of assertiveness or ambition. Rather, friends and associates say, it reflects her scrupulous discretion and selflessness -- the same qualities that propelled her rise through the legal ranks and into President Bush's inner circle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Miers was in charge of the SCOTUS search & she chose herself. Surprise.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 06:39 AM by CottonBear
Remember how Cheney was in charge of finding a VP candidate for the 2000 election and he chose himself?

"She's really obscure." CNN commentator just said this. "She has no record."

edit: When she was on the Dallas city council did she have to run as a R or D or was it a non-partisan race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That seems to be the general consensus.
Hell, even Mark Reilly on Morning Sedition called it that way this morning before the news broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Really? So Mark Reilly knew Miers was in charge of the search
and figured out what was going to come down?

I never get to listen to that show. My home computer can't stream non-Mac compatible streams. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yup, I was listening to him say the same things at 6:45 that we're
saying now and before he'd seen any news articles this morning. They were having a studio pool on who would be nominated. The other Mark picked Gonzales, Reilly picked Miers, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Depending on how long ago that was it may not matter
because many Texans who were dems several years ago are quite conservative and have become repugs.

I think Phil Grahm was a dem once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. From the looks of things she was a Democrat in '88
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. Good find.
I'm really not quite sure about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Wasn't Cheney in charge of the VP search before the 2000 elections? n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. Yes !
Don't you love how these Bushies operate :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Scrupulous discretion and selflessness...
...the same qualities that propelled her rise through the legal ranks and into President Bush's inner circle...."

Hmmm...

Yes, those have long been PRIZED qualities in the Bush "inner circle"...

scrupulous discretion and selflessness...

The same qualities Karl Rove and / or Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney, George Bush used when leaking Valerie Plame's name.

...scrupulous discretion and selflessness...

Excuse, me, I feel a small, patriotic tear welling up in the corner of my eye. President Bush was RIGHT, he DID bring "honor and dignity" back to the White House.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I didn't say I agreed with the article, just that it had information
:evilgrin:

It's just more cronyism by Bushie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, I didn't take the post as an endorsement...
But that line about the "special qualities" of the "inner circle" was like wavin' a red flag in front of a bull...I could not resist, nor did I attempt to...

:evilgrin:

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Did you see my other post?
Apparently, she's donated to Democratic campaigns in the past . . . seems to have stopped in '88 though.

http://www.newsmeat.com/washington_political_donations/Harriet_Miers.php

Makes you wonder what happened to make her change 100% in '88
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yes, I did...
She might actually be a decent person who got sucked into Gomer Bush's "aw, shucks" vortex...who knows at this point.

I mean, seriously...every last ONE of his cronies can't be 100% pure walking evil...can they?



...err...never mind.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. "Selflessness" "Discretion"? How do we know since she has no record?
:grr: She will have NO record to question. Easier to avoid answering. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's the big problem I have with this appointment.
No paper trail. No record of her positions on abortion, affirmative action, gay rights, etc. She's an unknown quantity.

And she can clam up during the hearings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. she thinks the asshat is the most brilliant man she ever met
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 06:53 AM by Donailin
you just can't make this shit up.

I'm sick to my stomach.

Good fucking Monday Morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. To * "Selflessness" = Loyalty to Bushco
and "scrupulous discretion" means she won't leak unless * wants her to, or until she's about to be jailed or indicted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
18.  "Selflessness" = Willing to throw yourself on own sword to defend *
in other words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. Her nomination can be rejected by dems possibly on her lack
of judicial experience. But what if she is a moderate? We just don't know. She could be the lesser of evils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Lesser of evils...



...you got THAT right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Gah! * & Miers live on TV now from Oval Office.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 07:05 AM by CottonBear
* blathering about not legislating from the bench? How can we know what she'll do since she's never been a judge or even a DA or a prosecutor?

Let's see what the Bar Association has to say about her. They wnat SCOTUS nominees to be among the "best legal minds in the nation." * is saying she's devoted herself "to law and order." How the hell has she done that?

Another tidbit: She's never been married. No husband or children issues just like Condi. Makes her more of an unknown quantity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Being never married kind of reminds me of Souter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
23. She's kinda like Condi part 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. a Freeper post
Froma a friend of mine, some minutes before Bush's choice:

I don't see Harriet Miers getting picked. It would open up her tenure as Texas Lottery Commissioner to intense scrutiny and the central controversy of that period involves GTECH gaming scandals and Bush's Texas Air National Guard service.

Is that what Bush wants in the public eye as the Safavian and Abramoff scandals break?

From the Amarillo Globe News 7/29/99:
"Littwin's attorneys also have questioned whether Bush allies, in return for the Guard appointment, helped the state's lottery operator, GTECH, fend off efforts by Littwin that might have upset its lucrative contract.

An unsigned letter to a U.S. attorney in 1996 that Littwin's lawyers obtained in their case prompted questions about the Guard, The News said. The letter was sent after the three-member Lottery Commission voted unanimously to extend the GTECH contract for five years rather than seek new bids.

It alleged that GTECH was allowed to keep its contract in return for Barnes not revealing his help in getting Bush into the Guard, the newspaper said. A former top Bush aide who now lobbies for GTECH brokered the deal between the governor and Barnes, the letter said. Both the former aide and Lottery Commission Chairwoman Harriet Miers denied the accusations."

The allegations haven't been proved but making them the central focus of a second SCOTUS nomination seems unlikely.

Posted by joejoejoe at September 28, 2005 09:53 AM


420 posted on 10/03/2005 5:23:41 AM PDT by alessandrofiaschi (Is Roberts really a conservative?)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies >


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1495585/posts?q=1&&page=401


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. She represented Bush on a small "title dispute." And, checked every
piece of paper that crossed his desk before Gonzalez became Attorney Genera. According to Nina Totenberg on NPR this a.m.

"She oversaw every piece of paper that crossed his desk..."hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
27. did I just hear on the radio that Harry Reid
is a supporter of hers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. He's not a "supporter". He simply threw her name out as someone
who MIGHT be looked into, according to a news show this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC