Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush is supposed to choose a judge thats best for the Nation...Not HIM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:54 AM
Original message
Bush is supposed to choose a judge thats best for the Nation...Not HIM
And this is why Harriet Miers will not do....

She is too close to Bush....to be on the SCOTUS....

Having tried, Bush will go to back up....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Satan picks good friend to help him out; cover his ass, lose his
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 02:57 AM by texpatriot2004
papers that kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Much too much shit on the dear Lady....Part of the secretive BushCo
The Nation will be put at risk if nom makes it past the Senate filter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. When has Bush ever done the right thing
except if it benefits him personally in some way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup, its all about HIM.....this is what makes him a horrid Prez
its always aboiut HIM....never the peeps and the FUTURE....revealing a small and narrow mind...the result of not reading...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why should this nomination be any different ? Shrub hasn't done
a thing for this country. All of his actions have benefited his rich cronies and big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Position much to important...The Peeps will oppose this one.tooth and nail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. bush says he knows her mind n' her heart...he knows she will do everything
possible to hide his crimes--that's why knowing her heart and mind is more important than knowing whether or not she is qualified. in fact, in bush world, the only qualification is whether an applicant, or a nominated-nominee will work toward protecting the bush boy and towards hiding his crimes. they've got to be a member of the crime family and the bush evil empire.

imagine an afternoon tea at the white house between laura bush, condoleezza rice, karen hughes, harriet miers ... anyone else to add to the list? yeah, why not add to it old ma' bush and the twins.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Instead of tea, I would go surfing/diving/shopping, hunting, bowling,
anything BUT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. I can't believe I share this opinion with this person!!
"But her qualifications for the Supreme Court are non-existent. She is not a brilliant jurist, indeed, has never been a judge. She is not a scholar of the law. Researchers are hard-pressed to dig up an opinion. She has not had a brilliant career in politics, the academy, the corporate world or public forum. Were she not a friend of Bush, and female, she would never have even been considered.

What commended her to the White House, in the phrase of the hour, is that she “has no paper trail.” So far as one can see, this is Harriet Miers’ principal qualification for the U.S. Supreme Court."


This was Pat Buchanan! (from the Hardblogger page on MSNBC)

For the first time in his life, W has actually beeen a unificater, not a divisabler! He has brought the far right and the far left together in their revulsion of this appointment. And some of the squishy squashy middle is just grateful, because, hey, it could have been worse. I honestly cannot imagine any situation that could be worse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC