Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Presidential adviser Karl Rove to give additional testimony!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:18 PM
Original message
Presidential adviser Karl Rove to give additional testimony!
FROM DRUDGE.

Presidential adviser Karl Rove to give additional testimony in CIA leak case without guarantee he won't be indicted later, people familiar with the investigation say... Developing...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh MY! Is Rove gonna be the WEASEL????
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:22 PM by HereSince1628
I gotta wait til it's somewhere other than Drudge

on edit...or is he just gonna try to spin the GJ so as to hope to avoid the pending indictment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Now breaking on CNN. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. THANKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. This website has the best TreasonGate info on the web......
http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/


Lawyers and ex-prosecutors who really know their stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Thanks, that one wasn't a place I'd visited before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. On CNN right now... Wolf is talking about it... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Assuming Rove has been told he's a target, he's going to take fifth.
He's not going to testify about anything if he's a target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, the whole point about the warning is to scare someone into spilling
the beans in order to get a plea bargain.

Rove couldn't get very far in a plea bargain claiming the 5th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Rove would need his bargain BEFORE testifying.
Once he testifies, he has nothing to offer.

So he refuses to testify, and then, possibly, offers testimony in return for a plea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Well, sort of. But why would Fitz being calling him now?
I think only because Fitz has done the metamorphosis and changed an ass into a weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Because they have something new they want to ask him about.
It's not a satisfactory answer, but then again, Rove isn't getting a satisfactory answer on that point, either.

They could have something contradicting his previous testimony. Or something new they want to ask him about. Or they want to see if he says the same thing the second time around. Who knows?

The very fact that Rove doesn't know where they are going with these questions and he is a target tells me he is going to refuse to answer a lot of questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. True that's would be the most obvious reason, but after 2 years
I can't imagine Fitz and the GJ have any reason to just be trolling through Rove's recollection for the hint of something useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Ah, but trolling is exactly what a grand jury does!
They are looking for conflicts, or corroboration, and the old perjury thing.

They are looking for answers to the questions they forgot to ask, or came up from other's testimony, or whatever.

It's a wide open investigation of dozens of people and several different possible criminal statutes. A central figure is going to be asked back. Even if there hasn't been any, er, discrepancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Agreed..
.. that there will be no claiming the 5th, but also i doubt there will be any plea bargin. They will do what they always do, let the little guy take the rap... Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Libby is littler but he lives high in the political food pyramid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. So..
.. he's going to try and spin Fitzgerald.

You have to assume, behind closed doors they have know exactly what each of them said to Fitzgerald. When it's all laid out in front of Rove I am sure he will think he can come up with an innocent explanation. It's dangerous though, but they have nothing to loose.

He is not doing this to give in that much is for sure. Maybe they have decided Libby will take the blame.

I think I may explode before indictments are made!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Maybe but maybe Fitz has him dead to rights and to avoid prison
he'll have to provide something useful. You don't _really_ believe that it stops with Rove do you? The whole yellowcake mess has Cheney's finger prints all over it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I have trouble with that..
. look at how the various indictments overlap. One of them goes down and eventually they all will. They will stick together. Besides if anybody caves, IMHO it will not be Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. But bullies like Rove often turn out to be cream-puffs
I can't imagine Fitz asking Rove in at this late date. Cooper was clearely damaging to Rove, it is difficult to believe that Fitz needed Miller to find a reason to get more Rove testimony.

I think we are likely looking at the desired outcome of the warning letters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. True..
.. but he really has so much to loose. He is the man who made up half the lies. It's pretty certain he ordered Libby et al to spread the word.

He is so confident in his own abilities, he thinks he can get out of this, and it's worth a try.

I think the only thing, right now, we can draw from this is Rove knows Fitz has a case, a good case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yes, IMO you're right, Fitz has an excellent case against Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Possible meaning(s)?
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM by npincus
Rove's additional testimony was required:

1-because of something Judy Miller said

2-bcause Fitzgerald is wrapping up his case and has additional questions

3-because witnesses following his intial grand jury appearance have called that testimony into question

4-Fitzgerald wants to confirm his original testimony from which he may/may not issue an indictment(s)

MORE?????????????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Think he's probably gonna "spill" something about that Marine? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I woudn't be surprised to see Libby re-testify next...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Here is the important bit...
Rove offered in July to return to the grand jury for additional testimony and Fitzgerald accepted that offer Friday after taking grand jury testimony from the formerly jailed New York Times reporter Judith Miller.

Before accepting the offer, Fitzgerald sent correspondence to Rove's legal team making clear that there was no guarantee he wouldn't be indicted at a later point as required by the rules.


So yep Fitzgerald seems to have his case and wants to offer Rove the change he wanted in July. Rove really has to watch what he says here. The fact that Rove asked in July and not after Miller testamony means it's done on Fitzgeralds terms, not Roves (who presumably would have liked it in July).

Has Fitz blind sided them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Tearfully begging on his knees, Karl sings like a little birdie
...yet he gets indicted anyway. He's going in to try and save his hide with a fourth (count it, FOURTH) appearance, knowing full well that there's no guarantee this will save him from an indictment.

He'll be a blubbering coward, begging for mercy as he tries to check his native tendency to threaten.

Show what you're made of, sniveling sniper. He's the epitome of the vicious asshole bully who caves in abject fear and betrays everyone in sight to save himself. No wonder he's a friend of Novak.

Fitzgerald may be well worthy of a profile in courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. If I understood correctly...
if Rove cops a plea bargain then he could become an unindicted co-conspirator---according to Laurence O'Donnell on Huffington post...just a thought. I don't care what manner he goes down as long as he goes there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC