Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

by calling opposition to Miers "elitist," they admit she's non-qualified.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:08 PM
Original message
by calling opposition to Miers "elitist," they admit she's non-qualified.


to me, elitism is when people receive different treatment in a non-technical capacity because of prestige. Only allowing the pilots of a plane into the cockpit is not elitism because it is their technical capacity to fly the plane but only allowing college graduates to get up out of their seats during the flight would be elitism.

Instead of making a case that she is qualified, her supporters try to dismiss the legitimacy of the argument that she is not qualified to sit on the Supreme Court by calling it "elitist." That is like countering to the argument, "the pilot of this plane isn't qualified to fly the plane" with "that's elitist!" instead of trying to argue that s/he is is licensed to the fly the plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. Everyone knows it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, apparently there are people in this country who believe it's okay
to put people in positions of power and grave responsibility as long as they're somebody you'd want to have a beer with. That's much more important than ability. Ability & quality & expertise, that's so elitist. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitrusLib Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Sounds like the company I work for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. One of those really pedulciar right wing buzzwords...
Support for civil rights used to be "elitist"--as in "Elitist liberals won't have to work with those people."

Lately I've seen the same empty-headed phrase used in opposition to gun control and environmentalism...by the same sort of folks who used to oppose the civil rights movement...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Brit Hume said that the opponents are all Ivy Leaguers.
I guess lawyers and senators are included in the elitist club.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Didn't Chimpy drift through Yale and Harvard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yep, it didn't make sense to me either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw the strategy on Faux News...
Brit Hume and Fred Barnes were giggling over the fact that "all but two" of the conservatives who oppose Miers went to Ivy League schools and THAT must be why they don't think she's qualified.
They named names. They turn on their own to save their God. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about this for a frame:
"There's nothing more elitist than cronyism!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Make up the bumperstickers, and I'll buy one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Here's one--please feel free to copy and use!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Nice! Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kay Bailey Hutchison,
when asked last night on Hardball about Miers' qualifications, started talking about how seven of the nine justices of the Supreme Court had gone to Ivy League schools.

What the hell has that got to do with anything? Nobody's questioning her education. Nobody has implied that she isn't good enough because she didn't go to Harvard or Yale.

What people are saying is that she doesn't have the legal qualifications for the job. It doesn't matter where she went to college. Hutchison talked about colleges and other such nonsense because it was easier than defending Miers' qualifications.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC