Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think the RW's negativity about Harriet Miers is a bluff, but...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:19 PM
Original message
I think the RW's negativity about Harriet Miers is a bluff, but...
this is what Alexander Hamilton said:

"He would be both ashamed and afraid to bring forward, for the most distinguished or lucrative stations, candidates who had no other merit than that of coming from the same State to which he particularly belonged, or of being in some way or other personally allied to him, or of possessing the necessary insignificance and pliancy to render them the obsequious instruments of his pleasure."

Federalist Paper No. 76
April 1, 1788

BTW, for those who didn't graduate from Harvard - Webster on line: obsequious = marked by or exhibiting a fawning attentiveness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Neocons came up with the idea of wedging using gay & women's rights vs.
Xtians. This was only a tool to get neocons in power you understand. The real agenda was to get rid of all regulation and turn the world Ayn Rand.

Rove, in Choosing Miers, has given them exactly the pretense they hide behind... a gay hating, racists, white Xtian who will flip Roe vs. Wade.

Perhaps Rove and Bush are angry at the neocon for taking them into war on false pretenses.

Something fishy is up. The neocons are furious to actually be stuck with someone representative of the electorate they use, the very electorate they set out to use 30 years ago.

Something very odd.

Obviously the neocon intellectuals never expected the walking - talking poster child for how they get elected to make it to the top.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I learned the word "obsequious" from Steve Martin
on the "Let's Get Small" album. While attending a public college. I always was a nerd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. When Tony Blakley goes against ANYTHING * says, you know it is fake
I can't remember when I have ever seen that him go against ANYTHING * or his misadministration did or proposed.
At least, that was MY signal that this opposition was phony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Or Ann Coulter
These people just don't say bad things about Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey man -I didn't go to Harvard, but still know what obsequious means
Couldn't spell it to save my life, but I'll counter your Alexander Hamilton with a Mark Twain "I never had any respect for a man who could only spell a word one way."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why would they need to bluff?
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. To fool the Dems into believing that she is moderate.
Or that the Dems won't need to filibuster. Or just to confuse the situation enough so that she will win on the vote of the whole senate. Watch - I bet she passes the committee by just one vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC