Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Litany of woes for GOP, from Miers to Katrina, Frist to DeLay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 02:30 PM
Original message
Litany of woes for GOP, from Miers to Katrina, Frist to DeLay
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D8D4NFC82.html


It's hard to tell which is more irritating for conservatives less than a year after they savored Republican election triumphs of 2004: President Bush's latest pick for the Supreme Court or his high-dollar pledge for recovery from Hurricane Katrina.

Either way, the double dose of discontent might be easier for the administration and Republican-controlled Congress to manage if their list of problems stopped there.

In purely political terms, several Republican strategists expressed disappointment that Bush had not selected a nominee who would rally the party's core supporters and trigger a battle against Senate Democrats and the abortion rights groups aligned with them. These strategists spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to detract from Miers' confirmation effort.
-------------

From Sept 2004:


http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0409.drum.html


What do we have to look forward to if George W. Bush is elected to a second term? One word: scandal.

Don't believe me? Consider the highlight reel of reelected presidents over the past 50 years. Ike won a second term and watched in dismay as his chief of staff was forced to resign over a vicuña coat. Richard Nixon buried George McGovern in 1972 and then resigned a year and a half later when Watergate finally caught up to him. Ronald Reagan sweated out his second term wondering if he'd be impeached over Iran-Contra. Bill Clinton didn't have to wonder: Two years after his reelection, he was defending himself in the first impeachment trial in over a century.

George Bush is more susceptible than most to this dynamic. Partly this is because his party controls Congress, so he has no real political oversight to keep him honest. But it's also because both Bush and the current Republican Party leadership have already demonstrated a ruthlessness and disregard for traditional political norms unseen since Nixon was jotting down his enemies list: holding open votes while they bully recalcitrant colleagues, ramming through midterm redistricting, suspending the Freedom of Information Act in all but theory, and cavalierly hiding routine budget data from Congress--all combined with a general mania for secrecy that leaves even John Dean in awe. It's a dangerous and intoxicating brew, and George Bush has demonstrated the combination of ruthlessness, siege mentality, and religious faith in his own righteousness that makes it almost inevitable that he will take a step too far.

Second, there's the problem that second terms are, well, second terms. It takes more than two or three years for a serious scandal to unfold, and problems that start to surface midway through a president's first term usually reach critical mass midway through his second term, a phenomenon that shrewd political observer Kevin Phillips calls "the sixth-year itch." It's like a political SAT: What's the next year in the series 1958, 1974, 1986, 1998?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ha, the pugs are falling apart before us
Time to grab some popcorn and pretzels and enjoy the show.

We need Wes Clark or Al Gore in there in 2008-- split them further and push their collapse even further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. And now "Stewart Simonson"
This one should be interesting.. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neocondriac Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's just keep pouring gas on this inferno.......
Unlike the wicked witch they must all be burned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC