Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BTW: It's not "National Health Care"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 07:39 AM
Original message
BTW: It's not "National Health Care"
It's "National Health Insurance".

Big difference that the CONs try to confuse the issue with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, and I think that the difference is important.
Clinton labeled his effort as "Health Care Reform" which allowed the insurance industry to make the Harry and Louise ads implying that delivery of services would be changed, bureacrats would make medical decisions, people could not choose their doctors, etc.
Health INSURANCE Reform. (Thank you)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. To me it doesn't matter. Anyone that would oppose
bringing universal coverage to american citizens (read - those that profit under the current system) is going to spin and propagandize ANYTHING, regardless of the verbiage or the specifics of the multiple ideas that are out there.

I think it's more important to frame the issue first - health care is a RIGHT - and then discuss the positves and negatives of each plan brought forth to address this right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Health care is really expensive to be a right.
I agree that people should not be denied care under any circumstances, but the crux of the issue has generally been how to pay for it.

Of course, the health care industry is so bloated and inefficient right now that a government-subsidized system could only be an improvement from a cost perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero2 Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't agree with you on that
The VA hospitals is as good as any private hospital and are efficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Part of the reason why Republicans have spent us into the ground
is to prevent us from enacting a meaningful healthcare entitlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saddemocrat Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. actually...
That depends on where you go. There are some good VA hospitals, but....a great deal of care provided by military and VA hospitals is unfortunately substandard.

My dh is a physician who did residency/fellowship as a civilian and his experiences in the VAs attached to the university hospitals often made him cringe. My mom is retired military who was in vietnam...and...she is assessed charges for her care based on her income. Because she doesn't live below the poverty line she pays enough that she doesn't use va services anymore...why would she when she can get better care at a private hospital and pay less...

Our veterans and military people really get the short end of the stick. Not all VA and military facilities are bad, of course...but the overwhelming impressions that we have heard are not positive. Most retired military know the 'good' and 'bad' VAs..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. So basic human rights are measured by price tag?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Very true! Thanks for posting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC