Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The reason the right is abandoning Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:33 PM
Original message
The reason the right is abandoning Bush
is that they are realizing that he is incapable of pushing their agenda. They haven't given up on their ideas-they are giving up on a man who is politically dead in the water.

Bush was, and remains, a figurehead. The people who put him there, and who are now showing their disappointment, are not our political friends.

Just a friendly reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ann Coulter's tirades this week are outward signs of that.
We also see groups like the Heritage Foundation expressing distaste in the President (even saying *'s words about giving NOLA all the help they needed as "all talk, no action" a month after that speech).

But, we need to keep our friends close, and our enemies closer. We need to keep our eyes on the far-right wingnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. And the "leak" of that "rehearsal" tape of the Prez. talk with soldiers...
was also an indication of where the powers-that-be stand on their loyalty to Shrub. With "censorship" gone...this Admin.'s a 'paper tiger.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nobody's saying they're friends. Just enjoying the view from the stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. That's true.
it has been a pretty good show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nobody at my house is likely to be cozying up to Jim Dobson anytime soon.
You're right -- the Right is a nasty gaggle of malcontents. To hell with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. According to
Andrew Card and John Derbyshire on C-Span, GW is just in a slump, give it 6 months and america will forget whats going on now. GW is a great leader and he just had a few set backs thats not his fault. And tomorrow pigs will fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. definitely true
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. The 2008 Republican nominee is going to run against Bush.
I think a small part of this is that they're setting up for 2008, and part of that plan is that the Republicans will want their nominee to be seen as running against Bush.

So long as the focus is on Bush's personality, they'll have a chance of distracting people from the issues and they'll have a chance of getting in another Republicans who will continue to polarize wealth and opportunity by destroying labor and ripping people off with the tax code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think you are right
and in addition, whenever the Dems try to do the same thing, we will be accused of playing the politics of personal destruction and of running against someone who isn't even in the race. When we do it, it will be "going negative". When they do it, it will be "an honest and straightforward review of past mistakes" which will serve the duel purpose of looking good while signaling to the base that THIS time we will get the job done.

So, in essense, if GWB didn't let those gays get abortions (or whatever the hot cultural issue is), the next guy really won't let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC