Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Somebody Sure Wasn't Thinking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:19 PM
Original message
Somebody Sure Wasn't Thinking
Something I noticed. John Edwards lost to Wesley Clark by 838 votes according to the count I saw. John Edwards also received votes in the Republican race yesterday. He got 808 of them there. Think about it. Also, just as an additonal note, there were over 1,400 vots cast for democrats in the republican race. What a waste ....

Thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. sure they were thinking
it's what they had to think with that was the freaking problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingNOT Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the USA needs MORE of that kind of Republican thinking
Think about it - if Republicans in their own primary are voting for Democrats they could, just possibly, be expressing their dissent with Dubya.

We all know that the Republican base is supposed to be more solid in voting for Republican candidates than the Democratic base (this has been illustrated in opinion polls).

But if Dubya's OWN base is starting to crumble and consider Democrat potential nominees...

... well the chances of a Democrat in the White House may just be looking a lot rosier ! (Assuming the votes are counted this time...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. It would have required calendrically-advanced thought.
It would have required advanced thought (in a calendrical sense).

In New Hampshire, when you register to vote, you declare
a party affiliation. You are either enrolled in the Democratic
Party, enrolled in the Republican Party, or you are "Undeclared".
(The Libertarians briefly had so-called "ballot-status" as well,
but it only lasted two years.)

Yesterday, only those people who were enrolled in the Democratic
Party or who were "Undeclared" could take a Democratic Ballot.
Folks who were enrolled in the Republican Party could only take
a Republican Ballot.

(And yes, it's symmetrical: The "Undeclared could actually take
either ballot, but almost no "Undeclared" voters actually did
so yesterday, per eye-witness reports from the polling places.
By comparison, about half the people taking Democratic ballots
were previously "Undeclared".)

The deadline to switch party affiliations was the end of October
*LAST YEAR* (2003). As a result, a *LOT* of enrolled Republicans
who wanted to vote for one of the Democratic candidates on
yesterday's Democratic Ballot were denied the opportunity to
do so. As a result, some took a Republican ballot and wrote-in
a Democratic candidate. Some simply walked away disgusted.

That's how all those write-in votes for Democratic candidates
came to be on Republican ballots.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. If They Were Registered Republican,
they couldn't have voted in the Democratic primary. Independents can vote in either primary, but party members can't switch.

So your observation holds only if they were registered as independents. It's more likely that they were registered Republicans making a protest vote against Bush. Good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC