|
* I'm as amazed (4.00 / 4)
as anyone about the pieces coming together, about the indictments coming down, and about the possibility of the entire corrupt edifice being toppled (although I am choosing to keep the euphoria in check for now, just in case).
But more importantly, if indeed Fitzmas is coming and the Grand Jury indictments blow the cover off the entire neocon thinktank/conservative/DC/abuse of power/corruption/kickback/electionfraud axis, then we, the people, should be thinking about what our demands should be in the aftermath:
what will we consider adequate and satisfactory as far as full disclosure of facts and events?
how do we want to hold all responsible parties accountable for their actions, omissions, aiding and abetting, etc., of the crimes that have been committed?
what oversight do we believe is essential to ensure that all procedures and actions are fully and completely followed, so that justice is truly done?
What are we calling for? Impeachment? Trials by jury? A truth and accountability commission? All of the above? What is the most effective instrument at our disposal to cleanse this country of the crimes that have been done?
And longer term:
what reforms, changes, laws, regulations, controls, oversights do we believe are vital to implement to ensure that this kind of abuse of power can never happen again?
How do we guarantee transparancy in government?
How do we make it impossible for shadow governments or shadow power-brokers to function in DC and beyond?
How do we get the corrosive effects of masses of unregulated, unchecked money out of politics?
How do we intend to hold media accountable, so that never again can a criminal enterprise like Bushco ever regain control over the levers of power?
And there are many more questions like this to be addressed. We are assuming that indictments will automatically lead to perp-walks and jail time, etc., but if we look at past cover-ups, the responsible are seldom held accountable - deals have been struck, pardons issued, leaving we, the people, to vent our outrage somewhat impotently after the fact.
We need, instead, to get our demands worked out and clearly articulated in advance, so that at the very same time that people are socked with the shock of indictments, we are ready to shape the response. We cannot just sit back and presume that proper procedures will be followed, that the experts (who we assume must exist) will direct the course of events.
As soon as it becomes clear that there is a "there" there, let's be ready to fill the pause, the silence, with clear, articulate and precise demands about what has to happen next. If we think our elected representatives will get the job done, we're wrong. We need to be there, steering, guiding, demanding, insisting.
So, let's get informed about the options. Let's determine what should happen. Let's consult all the relevant experts (constitutional lawyers, constitutional historians, political historians, parliamentary procedure experts, criminal lawyers, prosecutors, etc. etc.) so that we are ready with our demands.
Otherwise we risk sitting back, filled with a (justified) sense of self-congratulaion, while the entire project of justice sinks under the screaming outrage of the shills. Let's not let that happen this time. http://dailykos.com/story/2005/10/19/145557/54
|