|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
CrackpotAmerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:19 AM Original message |
Miers Summed Up By One Question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. How would she be able to protect him from impeachment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
2. Ummmm... she'd have no role in any impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrackpotAmerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. She would be up there on the second floor... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. The Supreme Court had a major role in the impeachment of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. That's a different story, and an indirect role. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Bush has made a fetish out of hiding incriminating records, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Nixon wasn't impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. True, but he would have been if he hadn't resigned and scurried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. Answer: No. Bush promotes ass-kissers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Why aren't the Dems on every camera putting forth the idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
6. THE SCOTUS has no say in an impeachment. The Chief Justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrackpotAmerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
7. I know it seems irrelevant, even stupid, but: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC