An average citizens says "I don't recall" when faced with a crime

that he or she committed, what are the odds that will fly legally for an average American? I mean really. Even if this person were to use a variation of that statement, such as, "I have no recollection" or "I do not remember" or any similar statement...would they be allowed to leave it at that? Would that be the end of the discussion? If they said, "I am a very busy person and I cannot recall" when asked about their words and actions related to the matter would that be acceptable?

That's what KKKarl Rover is trying to do and he isn't the first Rethug to try that bullshit either.

So, here's what I propose as a solution to this pesky memory problem. Free trip to tortureville (The Vice President supports torture) as a means to help jog their memories. Gitmo? or Abu Ghraib or Jordan maybe? How about it? I bet those slimy scumbags would remember many, many crimes they participated in then, huh?

That would probably be one of the most effective memory jolts. K*arl would probably think he was just going on Air Force 1 to some cool high mucky muck place, but then finds out he's been whisked away to a nice hospital where they will help him remember things.

:evilgrin:

:evilgrin: Down right glad to be of service.

person I don't remember.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Shorn of context, the list is absolutely meaningless. I might also remind you that Clinton was being questioned in a civil lawsuit, not the investigation of a potentially treasonous activity that lent aid and comfort to the nation's enemies.

By the way, how many times did the Gipper say he didn't recall or couldn't remember when asked about the Iran/contra affair? Or doesn't your research extend to murderous arms dealing and illegally supplying weapons to terrorists?

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.