Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the deal with Senator Corzine?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Allenberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:57 PM
Original message
What's the deal with Senator Corzine?
I've been looking at vote results from the senate, and his name has come up as "not voting" in a whole ton of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Noticed one last week. And realized he's in a campaign.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, that happens.
Kerry hasn't missed much this year, but last year during the campaign he missed a bunch of times.

I think it depends on how close the race is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You wonder in these days of many types of secure communication
that there can't some way for Senators (or congressmen) to be able to vote remotely under certain specified circumstances.

Maybe:
- if they are hospitalized
- for people competing in election
- funerals etc.

It is not only the legislator, but the area he/she represents. Corzine likely knew the issues and he shouldn't have had to choose between campaigning in the last week before an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's been campaigning for the last few months for Governor of NJ.
Guess you must have missed that with all the other news going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Allenberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I was going to say
we lost the cutting prices for Medicaid generic drugs by a single vote :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Except that not all votes work like that. It would have lost anyway.
Vote totals are almost always known. If a senator has a scheduling conflict, it's determined first if a corresponding senator for the opposition will also not be voting, and if there is no opposition senator who will be absent, the senator (Corzine) would show up to vote.

And, also, even ties are still GOP wins as Cheney is the tie-breaking vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. also, the Senate games the votes
republican senators up for re-election soon might be allowed to vote in a way that will look good for them, as long as the vote is going to go the way republicans want. If Corzine was there to vote, they doubtlessly would have called somebody back and made them vote against.

One can question the ethics of a Senator like Corzine not voting because his vote wouldn't have made a difference, but we can be sure it wouldn't have made a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Allenberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm not questioning his ethics
it just would have been nice to get the 50-50 split to make it look that much worse for the Republicans. It went 50-49 against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's wherethe gaming comes in. see, a GOP senator thinking he needed to
vote for a bill because he's in a blue state for instance, would tell his leader he has to vote with the Dems for re-election reasons. well, if they have the vote, they let him do it. If they don't they force him to stick with them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC