Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forrester took a shit in my mailbox (*campaign material attached)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:32 PM
Original message
Forrester took a shit in my mailbox (*campaign material attached)
I live in Hoboken, NJ and found THIS in my mailbox this afternoon... (sorry the image is too big- can anybody tell me the HTML to make it smaller?)

What a surprise, from the political party that impeached a Democratic president for a blowjob out of wedlock, condones outing a CIA officer for a political dirty trick to start a needless and stupid war, smeared the good name and deeds of a (Democratic) decorated war hero.... is there enough time in the day to list all of their hideous unethical and immoral actions? Is that how these sons of bitches want to win elections? With eleventh hour fecal drop-offs in our mailboxes? Man, I hope this backfires! I am fucking pissed... I want to hose down and disinfect my mailbox.


back side


front side
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing like the opinion of a bitter ex-wife
to soil a campaign. Forrester is a gutter troll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. You know, I think too many people are part of a "bitter ex spouse"
relationship to really rely on this when it comes right down to the ballot box (or touch screen, if you will)

I can hope anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good point. I hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I think Corzine missed an opportunity on Sat.'s debate
to vigorously attack this scummy tactic and humiliate Forrester for resorting to gossip from ex-wifey... Corzine could have generated a pithy sound bite about Forrester's desperation that networks would have picked up, which may have diluted the (possible) effect of this or even (?) prevented his campaign from going forward with it.

I think Corzine played into his hands (and this strategy) by dignifying it with this response: "She (ex-wife) can say anything she wants. That doesn't make it so". Bad move. He should have played it like the remark did not dignify comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. A politician has to be careful with things like that.
If you criticize the ex-wife, you'll probably piss off a lot of ex-wives in your State. Many people are very sensitive to situations similar to their own. I think he did the perfect thing by saying his ex has the right to say anything she wants. That way, the angry ex-wives will say, well, he's being fair, and the husbands can still sympatize with how John must feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Never a more objective source than an ex-spouse.
x(

It's kind of like reading accolades and then finding out that the candidate's mother wrote them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. And a stinking, sopping, fetid shit it was, too!!!
Ah, the politics of personal destruction, what page is that on in the GOP playbook?

Seems like Forrester has no ideas, so he is resorting to this cheap, desperate ploy. There is a place in hell for people who pull that kind of crap...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whoa. That's dirty bullshit right there.
Forrester should be arrested for being such a slimeball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Stick it in an envelope...
along with any other junk mail you might have, and mail it back to him...
postage due, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. You need to resize the image in a graphics program before uploading
I have a very slow dialup connection, and I'm still waiting for the images to load . . .

You can resize those images in a program such as Irfanview.

Keeping the size below 600 pixels on the longest side really helps those of us who suffer with such slow Interent connection speeds (24K).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. sorry- I scanned them at 50% (sized to 3 x 5 inches approx)
but don't know why they are so big.. hp scanning software indicated finished size was small (3 x 5 inches).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Size, such as 3 x 5 inches, doesn't indicate actual pixel size. You can
"shrink" a picture to 3 x 5 inches and still retain the 10MB size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. so, does 3 x 5 inches indicate the print size
and not the display size?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister K Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bitter...party of one....your table is ready


I will be voting for Jon tommorrow. I am really, really getting tired of this kind of crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC