http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/2005/trail/110905.htmVIRGINIA
As we've written in the past, every intangible favored Kaine in this race except one -- the state's demographics. But maybe even that wasn't so bad. The growth of Northern Virginia is clearly turning into a huge asset for Democrats. If a conventional Democrat like Kaine -- who ran a much more traditional blue state campaign than Warner did in 2001 -- can win by 6 points, then it's safe to say this is no longer a red state. Virginia is now a purple state, and assuming a moderate-to-conservative Democrat is the presidential nominee in 2008 (and a certain Republican senator is not on the GOP ticket), Virginia's going to be squarely in play.
<snip>
Speaking of Warner, we can't finish examining the meaning of yesterday without touching on his future. Clearly, his popularity was a huge boost to Kaine. If you ever wondered what Al Gore's 2000 campaign would have been like if Bill Clinton were as personally popular in the country as Warner was in Virginia, see Tim Kaine 2005.
Whatever Warner's image was among Democratic insiders, Kaine's victory only enhances it for him. We're very impressed, by the way, with the impeccable timing the Warner folks showed in having the invitation for their first New Hampshire visit drop in New Hampshire mailboxes... yesterday. Shows us just how cocky, er, confident they were that things were going to look good for Kaine.
As for the state's other presidential candidate, George Allen, he never was as attached to Kilgore's hip as Warner was to Kaine's. Sure, Allen campaigned hard for Kilgore, but the race was never the referendum on Allen that it was for Warner. So while it probably doesn't help Allen that Warner's national stature is only growing, it doesn't do any long-term harm for his own presidential hopes either.
***
On a separate note, is that National Journal article on subscribers-only? Because I have NO IDEA how I'm accessing it. I do NOT have a National Journal subscription, nor have I ever been billed for one.