Bush IS more dangerous than Saddam Hussein or even Osama bin Laden were.

El Supremo

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-11-05 09:13 PM
Original message

Bush IS more dangerous than Saddam Hussein or even Osama bin Laden were.

That's how I wish Teddy would respond to this smear.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan tried to turn the tables on Kennedy, saying he chose "Veterans Day to continue leveling baseless and false attacks that send the wrong signal to our troops and our enemy during a time of war."

He said Kennedy has "found more time to say negative things about
President Bush then he ever did about Saddam Hussein."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051111/pl_nm/bush_iraq_dc

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cha

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-11-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message

1. bush is more dangerous for

our country than sadam insane was..that's for damn sure, sco-tttty.

It was al qaeda who attacked on 9/11, remember, scotttty?

No WMD, no yellowcake, no FUCKING MUSHROOM CLOUDS STUFF, condiLIAR!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

kurth

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-11-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message

2. Bush is the worst evil ever foisted on a great nation

Democrats MUST retake the House next year - and impeach that worthless lying sack of shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

cliss

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-11-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message

3. Yes, Bush is more dangerous and here's why -

Saddam was a tin-pot dictator of a fairly small country in the Middle East. To be sure, Usama has a lot more territority.

But NO ONE has more power than Bush. He holds so much amazing power. He can jerk smaller countries around, and they come crawling back to him. He threatens to withhold aid, and they jump to his bidding.

Bush says "Jump", and other countries say "how high".

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

joemurphy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-11-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message

4. So Teddy is a dirty Islamic sympathizer? Good Scottie.

Kennedy is part of the loyal opposition, Scotto. He's SUPPOSED to be critical. The Republicans said more bad things about Clinton than they did about Milosevic. That didn't make them traitors and you never heard us accusing them of such.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

CoffeeCat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-11-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message

5. Scotty sounds more petulant and snotty than he ever has...

...and I love it.

It's remarkable that a White House communications director would be reduced to snide, defensive comments.

Scotty sounds more and more like a bratty child, and less like a professional.

Can you imagine being on the front lines every day- defending his scumbag boss?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

El Supremo

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Nov-11-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. Sounds like a child?

Man that guy IS a child. Who else would have taken that job?

He has got to be the most immature (he can't be very old), poorly voiced, defensive, badly presented, poor vocabularied and petulant press secretary there has ever been.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.