Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would your ideal political spectrum be?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:16 PM
Original message
What would your ideal political spectrum be?
If I could re-arrange the political landscape, I would create the following:

Democratic Party - Left, same as right now, only groups like PDA and DFA have the lion's share of influence.

Progressive Republican Party - This would be essentially a return to the moderate-liberal Northeastern party that dominated the Eisenhower years. People from the DLC, and suburbanites who want to keep abortion and limit our involvement in wars, but want few taxes would make up the lion's share of the party. It would be a moderate libertarian with a lower case "l" type of entity. Hillary and Michael Bloomberg would be prominent members. The GOP would miraculously purge their conservative wing and add "Progressive" to the beginning of the name, since they are progressive in a sense that is relative to the extreme right, even if they are only centrist.

Law & God Party - The current fundy and militant group that dominates the GOP would go to this party. They would never get more than 30% of the vote (in a very good election period) and would be margainalized to the deep south and parts of the plains.

Presidential lections would typically turn out like this in the popular vote:

Democrats: 45%-55%
Progressive Republicans: 30%-45%
Law & God: 7%-30%


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. The trick is to use militarism and religion issues as wedge issues AGAINST
Edited on Mon Nov-21-05 07:25 PM by funflower
the GOP, rather than letting them using them against us. Currently, creationism is a big wedge issue in conservative circles (drop it into a room of diverse freepers and watch); abortion also has that potential. The Iraq War is rapidly developing into a wedge issue. The election year conversation needs to be about these issues rather than about gay marriage and guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't misunderestimate Law and God,
When Alan Keyes pulls 27% in Illinois with no more platform than returning the nation to Christianity---without a single relative or political ally in the entire state--you can be pretty sure MOST states have 27% and the south considerably more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Keyes would pull 5% on the west coast and less in the NE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, don't be so sure. He was running against Obama
I'm in a suburb of Chicago that went 45% Kerry and there were plenty of Keyes signs out. Running against a handsome, articulate, nice guy with a national platform, Keyes paradropped into the state, campaigned practically nowhere BUT churches and still pulled 27%. I was pretty shocked.

Don't misunderestimate the theocracy, return to God faction. I put it at 30% nationally if Keyes got 27%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'd agree he'd get 25-30% nationwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where would the Libertarians, Democratic Socialists, Independents, etc go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. What I listed is just my ideal political spectrum
Feel free to add yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. i they would hang all the Fascists from the lamp posts and take the
license from any public air wave media for telling lies or intensional distortions and propaganda.. prohibit any campaign contributions form corporations, limit lobbyists to a weekly public publication and dis-allow any contributions.

the rest would take care of itself..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. NO MORE NEOCONS
and conservatives thoroughly leashed,The corporates OUT of government, the fundies keeping church in church..Andthe political environment consisting of the left, and lefter. Conservatives used to stand for THINKING through changes and being wise with spending...

These are "values" any person has who has ever had to live on a budget or had to think of someone ewlse besides themself has to live by.

Rich Ceo pigs kids do not have to stick to a budget they are born with silver spoons in thier mouths so they don't know what conserving or fiscal responsibility IS. The inherited wealthy they don't know how hard it is to live as a citizen dominated by corporate thieves like themselves who don't care about anyone they exploit because thier money is all that counts to them ..


The only "values" worth having in a government are LEFT...because they are about HUMAN rights,empathy,fairness and wise values that you don't see among the extremely wealthy people who never had to feel the pain of a budget that denies them what they want, or the suffering of poverty..

NEVER again elect a super rich and disconnected from the lower clasees kind of "elitist"person who inherited their wealth and never suffered like citizens have.NEVER again trust a super religious person or a corporate CEO to public office again. Given the massive money and zealot religion,these things corrupts decision makers into being assholes who can't think fairly because of a conflict of interests that does not consider the realities of the american people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC