Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio's vote goes funny again. Polls showed major support but election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 05:34 PM
Original message
Ohio's vote goes funny again. Polls showed major support but election
reform issues lose big. And the media is not saying shit.


http://commonwonders.com/


“One problem discovered Tuesday: Some machines began registering votes for the wrong item when voters touched the screen correctly,” wrote Jim Bebbington in the Daily News. “Those machines had lost their calibration during shipping or installation and had to be recalibrated.”

So the voting machines got dropped when they where shipped so once again
a machine error helps the republican side? Columbus, OH elected all dems officials
yet the same people turned around and voted against election reform @ better then
2 to 1?

Please pass this story on to your friends and to any reporters you know ....
Until we clean up the vote NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. The voting machines in Ohio are corrupt
When will Ohioans stand up and demand accountability?

C'mon, I grew up there. I remember Ohioans being skeptical. Get up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neocondriac Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Until the Democrats scream from the rooftops...
regarding Diebold, ES&S , Triad and Sequoia I will hold them equally responsible and complicit in this shadow government effort.The Illusion of Choice continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. RON had a lot of problems
One of which was that voters who were polled thought they could support it until they got in the voting booth and actually read the ballot language, which was complex and difficult to understand. Combined with the fact that supporters were asking voters to support 4 complex initiatives together was a killer.

RON also ran a negative campaign - something you NEVER do when trying to get a "ballot issue" passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 06:21 PM
Original message
Granted RON had problems but that does not explain the
massive error in the polls. I canvassed for RON and got good responses .....
when I saw the voting from the precinct that I canvassed it just floored me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Scene Magazine did a good short article on it here in Cleveland.
The "poll" that at least some here are citing was done days before the actual election and was a statistically small sampling. Also, it was a mail-in poll...

...they made a good point: Wouldn't you EXPECT the results of a mail-in poll to favor mail-in voting? Might the people who responded to a mail-in poll to support mail-in voting not show up at polls?


If the conjecture that the voting system is being purposefully manipulated is true, how do we WIN some elections? Just because we lose a few doesn't mean they're all rigged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Dupe
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 06:22 PM by Botany
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now We Know. They Can Steal It No Matter How Far Ahead We Are
Some of the measures that "lost" were ahead by 2-1,
and supposedly lost by almost 2-1.

We have to find a way to win the Presidency without Ohio or Florida.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady President Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. RON Amendments Lost
While I firmly believe that there have been major voting irregularities in Ohio, I also think that the RON Amendments legitimately lost.

The language was too confusing to read thoroughly and understand while standing in a voting booth. When in doubt people tend to vote 'no'.

It was easier to explain why to vote 'no'. For example, the anti-RON groups talking points were simple, "We'll have an extra layer of bureaucracy that we can never choose," or "We want freedom to make our own decisions." Our side had to give a lengthy explanation of how the non-partisan committee would be chosen, or how corporate donations are corrupting our system.

Most important was the anti-RON media and calling push the week before the election. Whoever came up with their angle was damn clever. (And I hate to admit that.) They claimed that groups from out-of-state were pushing the RON Amendments, but Ohio leaders and newspapers were against them. Of course, our leaders primarily Republican, as are our papers. After 2004 there are a lot of Ohioans that sick of people coming in to the state and telling us how to run things.

Bottom line, have there been voting problems in Ohio? YES! Did RON lose big? YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC