Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Federal Government should rebuild the levees in New Orleans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:33 PM
Original message
The Federal Government should rebuild the levees in New Orleans
to withstand a category five hurricane. Anybody who lives along an earthquake faultline in California or Missouri or Alaska object? Anybody who has received federal relief after a tornado in Kansas or Indiana or Arkansas have any problem with my strong wish and desire? I don't understand the nonsense talk about how stupid it is to rebuild in New Orleans. Maybe the city should secede, join OPEC and price gouge the hell out of the USA. Shut down access to or from the Mississippi River. Anybody for $8.00 a gallon gas? Would that play in Peoria? Use federal aid to rebuild the Big Easy or do away with the federal government. It seems to now exist only for rich people in America and poor people in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course they should. Just as the government is expected to
protect the citizens from foreign attacks, they should protect against catastrophic weather events. No questions asked. Send in the engineers and fix the f....ing levees and quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely
I can't believe the goddamned idiocy of people who think they shouldn't!

Half of Holland would be underwater if they were as short-sighted as we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Times-Picayune
New Orleans Newspaper had a what's hot, what's not column in Sunday's Paper. Hot - Dutch Levees. Not - New Orleans Levees. I fail to understand the rationale of those who suggest we just let the city go straight to hell and its citizens can just (well, just what?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. the 'Orleans Levee Board' owns the levees,
an agency of the state of Louisiana.\

I don't think it makes all that much difference
who fixes the levees, as long as the
levee board makes the decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. And the "Third Delta Conveyance Channel" and Coast 2050
Otherwise, LA will dissapear into the gulf for good....

Even with current site-specific coastal restoration projects, the Barataria-Terrebonne basins in southeast Louisiana continue to lose land at rates of 10 to 11 square miles per year. Drastic times require drastic action. The only way to save our valuable natural resources and a culture and livelihood unlike any other in the nation involves large-scale, long-term restoration projects like the Third Delta Conveyance Channel, an important part of the state's $14 billion comprehensive coastal restoration plan known as COAST 2050.

The Third Delta Conveyance Channel project signifies a return to the natural, delta-building system that, thousands of years ago, created the wetlands now at risk. By serving as a new freshwater lifeline leading from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico, the Third Delta proposal would provide sediment and invigorating nutrients to the Louisiana's coastal marshes experiencing the greatest land loss.

http://www.restoreorretreat.org/solution_third_delta_conveyance.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Look to Europe: All it takes is time and money (no excuse not to!)
LONDON, ENGLAND Pop: 7,421,000
London has been at risk for centuries--storm surges from the North Sea can swell the Thames Estuary and engulf the city. In 1953, a storm hit London during high tide, killing more than 300. Since then, the city has continued to sink on its clay foundations. (In fact, all of Britain is tilting toward the southeast by 2 ft. per century.)
DEFENSES: The Thames Barrier, a set of 10 steel-plated gates 65 ft. tall.
FORECAST: The barrier is secure, but with rising sea levels, storm surges will likely overtake the gates within 30 years.



http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/technology_watch/1829867.html



The Oosterscheldedam (Netherlands)

The crown on this giant flood-control project is the barrier dam that stretches 1.75 miles across the three channels of the Eastern Schelde. This dam consists of several strings of gates and their massive supporting pylons which, in normal weather, allow tidal sea waters to ebb and flow in the Eastern Schelde estuary, thus benefiting the fish and bird life and the local fisheries, even in the national park "The Biesbosch" part of the tide exist. During a severe storm however, like the one in 1953, the gates can be dropped to keep out the high tides and storm surges and prevent them from inundating the adjacent lowlands.


The Oosterscheldedam (repeat after me: Ooster-schelde-dam) where the Delta Expo is located, on one of the two artificial islands. The construction of the dam started in 1976, was achieved ten years later. Three kilometers long, this anti-tempest dam is constituted of 65 pillars between which one can slide 62 iron flood-gates. The height of one pillar is 38 meter and its weight 18.000 tons. When the sea becomes dangerous, one hour is enough to lower the flood gates. This system affords to keep 75% of the tide amplitude as well as the fishing industry, the breed of mussels and oysters and above all, the unique eco-system of The Biesbosch. To be complete, the site is powered by (guess what?)... air motors worthy of their windmill? too!

http://www.geerts.com/holland/holland-modern.htm


If Bu$h was not squandering the national treasure on his rich buddies and the War Against Iraq, we too could have world-class flood control for our flood-prone cities, like New Orleans. All it takes is time and money. Bu$h has criminally squandered both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. We should hold our convention in NO
Give them a hand up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC