Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

who really wrote the shiny “Our National Strategy for Victory in Iraq”"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 11:59 AM
Original message
who really wrote the shiny “Our National Strategy for Victory in Iraq”"

document? here tis:

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001613851


Victory in Iraq or Victory in the Polls? How Bush Caught the 'Feaver' in Big Iraq Speech This Week


In his major speech this week outlining a strategy for Iraq that might turn around public opinion on the war, President Bush used the word victory 15 times against a backdrop of dozens of “Plan for Victory” signs. Is victory really in our grasp—-and was the talk based more on changing poll results than really setting a wise course in Iraq?

The questions will gain even more relevance with a revelation coming in Sunday’s New York Times. It seems that in a part of the 35-page “Our National Strategy for Victory in Iraq” document posted on the White House web site, a few key strokes by those in know reveal that the document’s originator or author, is one “feaver-p.”

This person is Dr. Peter D. Feaver, a 43-year-old Duke University political scientist who joined the National Security Council staff as a special adviser in June. White House officials, while saying the document contained contributions from many federal departments, confirmed, according to the Times, that “its creation and presentation strongly reflected the public opinion research” of Dr. Feaver.

-snip-

But Christopher F. Gelpi, Feaver's colleague at Duke and co-author of the research on American tolerance for casualties, tells the Times on Sunday that this week's 35-page report "is not really a strategy document from the Pentagon about fighting the insurgency. The Pentagon doesn't need the president to give a speech and post a document on the White House Web site to know how to fight --the insurgents. The document is clearly targeted at American public opinion."
-snip-
----------------------------


Feaver is on leave from Duke and says he is: "Special Advisor for Strategic Planning and Institutional Reform, National Security Council Staff." what a bunch of crapola.

the article lists other things he has written for the bushgang.

Feaver's dirt should be dug up and spread around.

wonder who writes Rummy's articles.

this morning on Wash. Journal Mike, who always tries to plump up smirk, Allen said everybody at the W.H. had a hand in writing smirk's speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't understand. Bush has people write his speeches...
It isn't as if we don't know that, why is it necessary to dig dirt on the speech writer?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you have to ask?!

how strange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. our war strategy was written by Dr. Feaver?
that explains a lot...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He must have been sober
because Johnny gets better the more alcohol he gets!

Plan for Victory... Preparation H for the sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC