|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:02 PM Original message |
Lieberman replacing Rummy as Bush's Secretary of Defense???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkiGuy (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Kristol said that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Really? When? Where? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkiGuy (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Quote and link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. jeeze! The PNAC architect makes the case for Lieberman! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkiGuy (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Not sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. Holy fuck, I bet rummy's doing hand springs, cartwheels, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. More like Holy Joe as VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I think this will have a very negative impact on the party but maybe I'm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. Translation: I wonder what the people who disagree with me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
47. Liebertraitor has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. my only question, does CT have a Dem Governor? who may put a REAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Nope, their governor Jodi Rell is a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. What kind of Reep is he? do ya know? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. She is a pretty liberal Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
46. Sorry, the gov is a She! And she's pro-Civil Libertarian! Way Cool.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Idioteque (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 06:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
64. Senator Shays? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. hmm. that's an interesting question... who's the gov? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. Looks like somebody reads DU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Crap, Joe Lieberman is yet another demonstration that the Peter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrainRants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. Can you say "Democratic Patsie" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
11. Only if there is a small Dem majority in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
15. Which General Clark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. hmm. are you joking? Wesley Clark - is there another Gen Clark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Yes, but why him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
43. LOL! True - what was I thinking? [!] n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. Actually there was, one of my relatives is buried next to him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
16. Maybe they want Lieberman to be front and center to sell further |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Amen sister. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
18. Lieberman's military background? Zip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. No Military background?? My GAWD - Why not appoint Brownie, instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. But he's for expanding the war in the Middle East. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. Holy Joe has threatened Syria and Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I no longer think it's going to happen.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:48 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. They will not buck AIPAC and vote against him. e/o/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 04:55 PM Response to Reply #42 |
58. Joe would win near unanimous confirmation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
24. The BBC reporter - Kathy somebody said the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mazzarro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
25. Do explain how this will hurt the dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:28 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. They're going to tie everything to the D Card |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Lieberman is the new "Colin Powell" for the Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:37 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Yes, I remember too. Lieberman was a real slime ball in that campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Remember how Lieberman wouldn't drop out. I think he remained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. In principle I disagree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Yeah look where CIVILIAN leadership has gotten us. e/o/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrainRants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 05:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
59. Powell was immasculated as SOS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
27. Kristol is a loser. Don't bother with him. The internet contains tons of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Kristol is a loser? He's drafted the PNAC papers ? That Fascists Won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Cheney is being villified, Rumsfeld may be on the way out, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Ok, I get it now. thanks.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
30. If one of the reasons for going to war and being the imperialist in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. You expect someone in Congress to buck AIPAC and speak the obvious? e/o/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Doesn't the appointment have to be confirmed by the Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
48. this would be a stupid move for both Lieberman and Bush.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
49. Well, for those who want him out of the Senate, this is their chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
51. Transcript. (PDF) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Thanks - this is a Rush Transcript - but most of it is here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
52. Is it possible that this is serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. As Kristol said, this would be a brilliant move for W.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
55. What could POSSIBLY motivate such a selection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
56. joe's military credentials are lacking........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
57. Hate is a terrible emotion, one to be shunned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
60. You think Bush would ask CLARK!?!?! WTF! LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
61. That will never happen. It's a ploy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
62. You think Bush would ask CLARK!?!?! WTF! LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-04-05 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
63. Won't happen...and if it does... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC