Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Instruction Manual teaches against the law to use white phoshorus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 05:54 PM
Original message
Instruction Manual teaches against the law to use white phoshorus
Hope this is not a dupe: Just got it an email today

Army Manual: against the 'laws of war' to fire white phosphorous on ppl


http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/5185


IRAQ: ARMY SAID USE OF WHITE PHOSPHOROUS WEAPONS VIOLATED LAW OF WAR

BY: Judd Legum, Nico Pitney, Payson Schwin, Faiz Shakir and Amanda Terkel.

SOURCE: APAF's 11-21-05 column, "Progress Report."


Reversing numerous prior denials, Pentagon officials admitted last
week that the deadly incendiary white phosphorous was, in fact, "used
as a weapon against insurgent strongholds during the battle of Fallujah
last November." <1> <2> But the Bush administration defended its use,
claiming that phosphorus is "not outlawed or illegal." <3>

Yet new reports show that the Instruction Manual used by the U.S. Army
Command and General Staff School (CGSC) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas,
"teaches senior officers it is against the 'laws of war' to fire the
incendiary
weapon at human targets." <4> According to the UK Independent, the Army
manual "makes clear that white phosphorus can be used to produce a smoke
screen. But it adds: 'It is against the law of land warfare to employ WP
against personnel targets.'" <5>

However, the U.S. military repeatedly fired white phosphorous weapons against
human targets inside the city of Fallujah during its siege in November of
2004.
When white phosphorous particles come in contact with human skin, they will
burn through the flesh down to the bone.


ENDNOTES

<1> ATSDR's article, "ToxFAQs For White Phosphorous":
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts103.html

<2> Judd Legum, et al., APAF's11-17-05 Progress Report,
"Iraq: The Truth About White Phosphorous":
http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/apps/nl/cont...

<3> David Charter, Michael Evans and Richard Beeston's 11-17-05 Times
Online article, "Phosphorous Was Used For Fallujah Bombs, Admits US":
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-1875728,00...

<4> Andrew Buncombe's 11-19-05 Independent article, "US Army Rules Say:
'Don't Use WP Against People'":
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas327926.ece

<5> Ibid.
_______________________________________________________________
FINALLY, PLEASE READ 4 ESSAYS FOR BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS ISSUE:

George Monbiot's 11-15-05 CD/GU essay, "The U.S. Used Chemical Weapons
In Iraq - And Then Lied About It" :
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1115-29.htm

Dave Lindorff's 11-17-05 CP essay, "In Post-Saddam Iraq There Are
No Civilians: How The Pentagon Justifies Phosphorous Bombs On Fallujah":
http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff11172005.html

Reuters' 11-17-05 CNN editorial, "Torture And Phosphorous Disclosures
Hurt US-Iraqi Image" torture and chemical weapons on his own people. However,
the US military
has used torture, white phosphorous and napalm weapons against the Iraqis.]:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/11/17/iraq.analysis...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ironic that technically it isn't against the "laws of war"
but the statement seems to reveal that the writer thought it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Where does it say it is legal to use white phosphorous against people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nowhere
similarly, it isn't prohibited under any current US treaties (for 92 more civilized nations it is, but that's another matter).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC