Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we had what republicans have...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 12:01 AM
Original message
Poll question: If we had what republicans have...
In my opinion, since republicans took control of the presidency, house, senate and governorships, they have pushed their agenda even further to the right.

If we had a democratic president, majorities in the house and senate, and a majority of the governorships, would the party generally go further to the left than where it currently is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Back when we ran things in the 1960's-1970's most states were moving
slowly to the left. That all ended decades ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. The last time we had that...
...was 1992-94. Very little movement took place, as Dems (with Clinton in the lead) seemed scared to do anything that might be thought of as "liberal."

The time prior to that was 1976-80. That started out quite well, but a strong Republican showing in the 1978 midterms, quickly followed by the Iranian hostage crisis and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, caused President Carter to slow his program to a crawl, with most of the domestic action during the last couple of years being Carter's refusal to support a Democratic push (led by Senator Kennedy) for universal health insurance.

I think, if we were to find ourselves totally in control after the 2008 election, it would depend on how the election was perceived. If it was seen as a decisive rejection of the Republican philosophy and agenda, you'd see some move to the left. If it was seen merely as a rejection of an incompetent president or administration -- in other words, if they were seen as "bad conservatives" (the way George 41 was seen in 1992) as opposed to conservatism being bad in itself, you'd probably see another timid "we can't do too much, or they'll call us liberals" approach. In any case, though, unless and until real campaign finance reform is enacted, don't look for major economic changes that would be against the will of the "corporate money" folks to whom the candidates of both parties are more or less beholden.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tirechewer Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think it would
go more to the left, if only because it would have to undo all of the Freeper magic that Bush and his imps have done. Think FDR after Hoover, trying to pull people out of the Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. To the right. Power corrupts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yikes! While I agree that
power can corrupt, I do think that most dems feel a connection to democratic principles. Anyone who was just in it for power, regardless of wether it was rep or dem power, would probably look around and see the fact that most states are red, most governors are republican, most senators are republican, most congressmen are republican, the president and his whole cabinet are republicans. I think a power hungry politician would see republicans as the quickest route to power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. mind you things have drifted so far right... that leftward drift
would only take us to the middle or just over the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Definitely LEFT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC