Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems Fight 3rd Party Provisions inCampaign Reform Proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 03:21 AM
Original message
Dems Fight 3rd Party Provisions inCampaign Reform Proposal
simply another example of how dependent the democratic has become on the corporate teat and estranged from any sort of populist ideal. -nosmokes
--###--


Press release- For Immediate Release- December 1, 2005

Contact: Tim McKee, CT Green Party National Committee Person, (860) 643-2282 or cell (860) 324-1684

Mike DeRosa, State Co-Chair (860)956-8170 or (860) 919-4042 (cell)



GREENS OUTRAGED AT ANTI-THIRD PARTY PROVISIONS IN DEMOCRAT'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE PROPOSAL





HARTFORD, CT- Green Party of Connecticut officials express outrage at anti-third party provisions in the Connecticut Campaign Finance Reform proposals that have the backing of many General Assembly Democrats and some "reform groups' such as Common Cause of CT.



Tim McKee, CT National Committee Person for the Greens said, "The Green Party has long backed so called 'Clean Money' or public financing of campaigns, both locally and nationally for years, but this current Democrat backed proposal has anti-third party with provisions. We would have to gather 20% of the almost two million state voter’s signatures to qualify for any matching funds. Despite special rules that only third parties and Independent candidates must meet, such as qualifying for the ballot for offices such as Governor or other state wide offices with over 7,500 valid signatures, we would have to go thru even more special rules with another massive, expensive petition drive?"



McKee explained the other provision in the Democrat proposal calls for match funds for the Governor’s race by collecting over an amount of $250,000 in small donations of less than $100 dollars each. He added “ If we collect say, $50,000, $75,000 or even $100,000 dollars, most people would consider those to be very serious campaigns with serious candidates, but we would get NOTHING in matching funds. Greens would rather see prorated amounts to campaigns as incentives to show state wide support, rather than an everything or nothing approach than will shut out third parties."



Allan Brison, Chair of the New Haven Greens chapter wrote to CT. Common Cause and other CT. reform groups opposing these special anti-third party measures saying, "The bar set for donations and/or petition signatures is so high that no 3rd party candidate could ever qualify. We desperately need to open up the political process. The two major parties, even with campaign finance reform, with still continue to represent the same special interests they do today. We need more voices at the table.”



McKee noted that even state Republicans, such as Senator Ward are saying this may be unconstitutional.



Mike DeRosa, Green Party Co-Chair, said, “We just want a level playing field for all candidates and parties, not rules that in practice, will shut out legitimate people running for office. We still want the fairest public financing of campaigns, but we may have to look to legal action if this passes.”

-30-


===========================================================
THE GREEN PARTY OF CONNECTICUT is the third largest political party in CT. The Greens are also the third largest political party in the US, with 220 Greens officeholders in 27 states. Over 80 countries in world have Green Parties. Wangari Maathai, the 2004 winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, is Kenya's assistant minister for environment and an elected Green Party member.
===========================================================
National Committee member from Connecticut: Tim McKee (860) 324-1684
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is WRONG
there should be NO minimums for ANY party or independent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. On a glib note, I don't mind how many parties there are
As long as none of them is Republican ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I second that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tim McGee
This is the first sensible thing out of Tim's mouth in years. Too bad the other Ct. rep to the national party just quit the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC