Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean's latest statement on the war will have to be defended

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:54 AM
Original message
Dean's latest statement on the war will have to be defended
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 07:55 AM by win_in_06
By prominent democrats this week and probably on the news shows this Sunday. While Kerry speaks of an exit strategy for victory, our DNC chair says victory is impossible:

<snip>

(SAN ANTONIO) -- Saying the "idea that we're going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong," Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean predicted today that the Democratic Party will come together on a proposal to withdraw National Guard and Reserve troops immediately, and all US forces within two years.

Dean made his comments in an interview on WOAI Radio in San Antonio.


http://www.woai.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=C36A87B9-63A0-4CDE-AA91-B41571AFD3AF

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. They won't.
And none of their plans will reflect real withdrawal. Only Murtha's will make sense and not be full of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Murtha, this weekend, said that the Admin is moving toward
withdrawal. Cong. Murtha was on ABC with Stephanopoulos and said that he is pleased with the direction that the Prez took last week and now believes that the Admin is starting to move to withdrawal this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Other than maybe a Feingold plan,
Murtha's is the only one I see that makes sense since he wants to pull out to Kuwait and other areas. That was my point. Do you have a counterpoint or information I should know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. I don't see the backup for what he is saying
Transcript from the ABC News show on 12/4

STEPHANOPOULOS: You heard Mr. (Steve) Hadley right there. How will pulling out American forces -- you want them redeployed over the next six months. How will that make America more secure?

MURTHA: George, I like this guy. I mean, he's starting to come around. He's starting to understand what the American people are saying, and what the Iraqi people are saying.

STEPHANOPOULOS: How is he coming around?

MURTHA: Well, he's coming around because he's talking about redeployment. He's talking about pulling our troops out. And I can see, by what he's saying, that we're going to be out of there by the end of the year or very close to it.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But what's the answer to his question?

MURTHA: Well, here's the answer: There's two separate things that you have to look at. Terrorism is in Afghanistan. And the insurgency is in Iraq. The insurgents are all internal. Just three percent -- seven percent are Al Qaida.

So, what I'm saying is you have to separate terrorism, which is from Afghanistan, which is completely legitimate to go into versus the insurgency. The insurgency will be less. They want us out of there.

The Iraqi people want us out -- 80 percent; 45 percent say it's justified to kill Americans. Their communique says it's justifiable to kill Americans -- the official communique.

And then 77 percent of the people in the periphery -- Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan say, we need to be out of there. There's more chance of a democracy, less chance of terrorism.

The insurgency will be reduced if we get out of there.


I would like it better if Cong. Murtha was more specific in which things the Admin is currently saying show that they are moving toward pulling out of Iraq. I didn't hear that last week in Bush's speech or in anything else. They still seem to be on a 'stay the course' road.

I also want a definitive pronouncement that America has no plans for permanent military bases in Iraq. That is my own 'make or break' point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I don't see anything to back it up either, so it's
purely his opinion. As far as his plan goes, that's another story as he proposes to take us out of the line of fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. One wonders why someone would stay with the Democrats
when he has such open contempt for them in post after post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. He didn't say victory is impossible.
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 08:01 AM by bowens43
He said "idea that we're going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong,". And of course, this is out of context so the meaning is distorted.

If you don't take the quote out of context, Dean is saying almost exactly the same thing that Kerry and other leading Democrats are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. we cannot win
we are in the middle of a civil war, which we have started

You cannot win a civil war

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. I don't think it was out of context, I'm sure he meant it. Other dems
such as Pelosi, Kerry, Reid and others will no doubt be asked if they share this position.

Some will, some won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. which is unfortunate as it will put them into awkward positions
which is why they had pushed aside the question asking things like what constitutes victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
42. Where've you been? Kerry said no miltary success is possible for 2mths now
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 08:02 PM by blm
Surprised you haven't heard it....he has said it at least half a dozen times when he was out defending Murtha and tlking about his own withdrawal plan.

Kerry and Murtha both emphasized the past few weeks that MILITARY SUCCESS is impossible, and only POLITICAL SUCCESS is possible now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Dean is right
in fact everyone who says we must stay until we win, uses the vauge term, when the Iraqiis are able to defend themselves or something else that open ended.

I have no doubt that there will be a lot more Americans and Iraqiis killed before we leave years from now

This is a bad recurring dream called Viet Nam all over again


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Victory is impossible, it is simple, Compare the war on terror to
the war on drugs.
You can't win against they ideal that drives terrorist. You are not fighting a country or a group of people, you are fighting an ideal or belief that the United States is evil.
Once you take out one terrorist, there are 3 more lined up to take his place.
Fighting them in the way we are fighting them only enrages more of the world and creates more terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why the artificial opposition? Dean is proposing an exit strategy
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 08:23 AM by Mass
which is comparable to Kerry's. This said, I am very happy Dean said what he said, including concerning that Bush wants a permanent implication of the US in Iraq. This really needs to be repeated by ALL Democrats.

BTW, the same people that attack Dean for this comments also attack Kerry for his comments on FTN concerning troops doing search and rescue missions. Will major Democrats support him next week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. There is nothing to defend
We've already lost. Dean is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kerry is actually speaking of a faster withdrawal,
12-15 months versus two years. The difference is semantics, Kerry has himself asked how do you define victory. It's clear from all he's saying, that he wants to give the Iraqis a chance to work towards a political solution that gives rights to he Sunni minority.

There is no real war now - between 2 defined forces. Kerry's comment that they don't need to be trained to fight WWII, they need to take over the search and destroy and policing immediately is important. We can't even tell the difference between the insurgents and the Sunnis not in the insurgency and too few people know Arabic.

Kerry knows the danger of admitting that when we leave we haven't won. Think of all the lunatics that claimed he, singlehandedly as a 27 year old private citizen, lost the Vietnam War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. With Kerry, the difference is ALWAYS semantics.
I like the guy, but COME ON! He "nuances" himself into a political non-entity.

Even I can't listen to him for more that 2 minutes without nodding off...and I care about what he's saying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. I can listen to even hour long speeches
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 05:50 PM by karynnj
without nodding off. I am amazed by the depth of thought he explains and explains well. He is not a black/white person because the world he is accurately describing has millions of shades of gray - and the solution often requires admitting that.

I also was referring to whether you speak of winning or victory when I spoke of semantics - and for Kerry OR ANYONE that's what it comes down to.

Kerry's plan is clear and he has explained in detail at Georgetown, in shorter sharper reponses on Hardball, Face the Nation, Blitzer etc. and he has discussed it on the floor of the Senate and written it as a bill (that was sent to committee.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Question?
When has Dean been proven wrong on anything he has stated? He has not and he is correct again. We cannot win in Iraq, period. Get out as fast as we can is the only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemNoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Isn't it sad...
The truth always has to be defended while lies just lay around basking in the sun drinking Margaritas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbywizard Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Brilliantly stated, DemNoir...
It does seem that lies hold more esteem than the truth. The Repugs have figured out that it's a distration and an energy drain exposing lies and defending the truth. So they challenge everything and say anything until the electorate is just too tired and confused to care about the truth anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. It's not that the truth is hard to defend, but how it is defended...
Dean could have started an excellant debate on this issue if he had chosen his words more carefully. Now the frigging rethuglicans are going to have a field day pulling out the red meat and slapping Dems around again on the concepts that we are weak on national defense and don't like the military.

When are we Dems going to get the point about getting more votes? Now that prick Cheney is going to give a speech that is getting coverage on all three cable networks.

I'm sitting here, a former military member, about to puke because here is this lying bastard who said he had more pressing things to do when it was his chance to go to his generation's war while slamming Howard Dean for being truthful while using bad words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Let the RW pontificate and spew
Over 60% of American people polled KNOW that we lost.

Why the fuck is it so hard for Dems to back their leader when he speaks the truth?

I don't get it.

We fucking LOST. A Majority of the Public KNOWS WE LOST>

Who's trying to get dem votes from trogladytes, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. And I bet if you went to those 60 percent and asked...
who do you trust more to defend America - the Dems or Repugs, the Repugs would still come out with a large majority. Now, don't get me wrong, I don't agree with that at all, but it is a perception thing that continues to haunt us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. They may be in the mood for reality
when the death toll tops 5,000 in a year or so.

I'm hopeful that someone will come to the fore as a potential nominee who can speak to voters in a way that makes the RW scare tactics backfire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. You are free to believe Dean should choose his words, but
I'm glad he doesn't! I'm damn sick of "politically correct" crap! Just say it like it is and let the fur fly!

I like the way Dean doesn't try to couch his words so nobody can argue with him.

He says what many of us are thinking! More power to him! Let the Pubs go after him, he knows how to fight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Sigh......it has nothing to do with "politically correct"...but instead..
that instead of spending a week clarifying his words and having others clarifying his words, he could have instead said that the way the Bushies are carrying out this war is ensuring that it can't be won. That Bush lost this "war" from day one - and then go into how Bush would not send enough troops, armor or build a true coalition of troops.

Instead Dean threw the words that we can't win, which will be spun as our soldiers are losers and we (Dems) don't support them like the rethugs do. And I KNOW from my own experiences that military people do not want to hear that they can't win. It is like admitting defeat.

In my heart, I know that Howard Dean did not want this meaning attributed to what he was trying to state, however, in the current world of politics, that is exactly how it will be packaged and sold.

And do not take this as a defense of this war. I am not defending it at all. Just pointing out that we dems must be masochists because we seem to keep shooting our own toes off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I don't know, I can't read Dean's mind, but I and a lot of others I know
said from the very beginning of the Iraq invasion that "this was can't be won!" Arab's don't want a Democracy, they don't want the West interfereing in their business, and the invasion isn't going to bring Democracy to the region, or is it helping Shrub's war on terror!

I guess we just feel differently, because I think Dean said exactly what he intended to say, and it's the same thing I've been saying for 2+ years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #37
49. Great post....
and right on the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Yep, like Dean's comment that the GOP is mostly a white christian party
What about that isn't true? Yet it was assailed as another "outrageous Dean gaffe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. Exactly...
"What about that isn't true?"
That was a gaffe because it
a) implied that white Christians are unwelcome in the Democratic party
b) implied that there was something fundamentally wrong with being a white Christian
c) gave the "white Christians" he meant a wonderful talking ponit that puffed up their sense of entitlement.

Had he phrased it as "Their idea of diversity is tolerating the differences between Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson" or "There's more to America than the viewers of the 700 Club" or "They want to render unto Caesar the things that are God's" or even "Our party embraces diversity and tolerance; theirs is looking for heretics to burn" he'd have gotten the same idea across and not put his foot in his mouth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
47. But that's because lies are crafted to reflect what people want to hear
Meanwhile, there's truth (Next time he might phrase that better) and then there's truth (Jeeze, he sounded like an idiot when he opened his yap.).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. If Iraq is central to ending Terrorism like they say then there will be no
victory period. Does anyone on the face of the planet believe we can end terrorism? Can we make Iraq do the US's bidding when it comes to their oil fields? Yes we can but that supposedly is not why we are there killing people. Rumsfeld said yesterday that victory in Iraq does not mean an elimination of terrorism. WTF. Terror is not a country or a people it is an idea and the US Military will never stamp out ideas.They have repeatedly said Iraq is the War on Terror. It is impossible to win such a war by military might.. You need to change their ideas through education and not by killing their women and children...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. Why? He's speaking the truth
Why try to spin reality back into fantasy land again.

We dealt with the aftermath of Viet Nam. Now we are going to have to deal with the aftermath of IraqNam.

And its going to be much much much much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. Who will be first to say "Howard Dean doesn't speak for me."
He is right, and they know it. I guess many of our Democrats will feel the need to try to say it is not true, but it is true.

We are not going to win. We all know it. He spoke the obvious, and he will take the heat.

We are no safer with Saddam in jail...that was true also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Holy Joe was the first when Dean said that
"The world is not safer with Saddam captured"

John Kerry was second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. It was a politically disasterous comment to make, imo.
Though that's not a surprise coming from Dean, who causes me to wince every time he makes a public appearance due to his amazing ability to shove his foot in his mouth. Even if you believe we have to pull out immediately from Iraq, and then politically you argue that pulling out immediately is how we "win", otherwise you project a defeatist and pessimistic attitude that doesn't score points with the majority of voters. We've had * on the defensive for months and this did nothing to keep him on the defensive. Instead, we see Ken Mehlman on the offensive making the cable news circuit today to hammer away at Dean who has been put in the party dog house until this boils over, and we worry about his next verbal fuckup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The Truth hurts, we know. Go take an Advil now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. And in fact, now his people are doing damage control....
"Responding to Mehlman's broadside, Dean spokeswoman Karen Finney said that Republicans were "cherry-picking" Dean's words "just like they cherry-picked the pre-war intelligence."
"We can only win if the Iraqi people are able to play a greater role in peacekeeping, and we can only win if the president gives an honest assessment of what's really happening on the ground in Iraq," Finney said. "Staying the course and paying for good headlines are not a strategy. It's merely a bad excuse for not having a plan.""

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/06/dean.iraq/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. nice response
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #33
44. I agree...it puts the focus back on Chimpy and the GOP
and off Dean and the Democrats...which is where it should have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. No they're not
They're telling the truth and pointing out the Repub lies.
Repubs will lie about anything. The day is long past when Dems succeed by letting their lies go unanswered.

If that scares you, maybe you need to rethink things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. They're doing damage control, and very well, too.....
"If that scares you, maybe you need to rethink things."
Say what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Benchley, that is not damage control. That is more criticism of them.
There has really been no need for damage control at all. But I am waiting for the DLC to come out. Oh, wait, I forgot, Lieberman just did on CNN.

But since he even failed to impress Carville, and everyone knows he is probably going to go Republican....that does not even count anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. It IS damage control, and very successful damage control at that
"Lieberman just did on CNN."
And I'm sure he said "speaking for the DLC"...oh, that's right, he didn't.

"since he even failed to impress Carville"
Wish you purists would be consistent on which Democrats you want to vilify and which ones you want to purge...your vision of the democratic party is beginning to resemble Stalin's Russia, where people go back and forth from being non-persons as the whim strikes. This week Carville's back in the inner circle, but not so long ago it was off to the gulag with him (hahahahaha):

"Carville is one of our problems."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2143279

"I think Carville has always worked to keep the GOP and their alias, the DLC, in power. No surprise here that he is shilling for them once again."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2222971#2223132

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. Defining victory
I wonder what Kerry's definition of "victory" is. I suspect it is getting out in once peace while leaving an Iraq that doesn't immediately collapse upon our departure.

It is his framing. I didn't think it was a bad frame either. But Dean's statement sort of flies in the face of that frame, unless you consider of couruse that the kind of victory that the Republicans are talking about is the kind that is impossible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
40. Repukes Are Starting In

Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2005: Contact: Ben Kilgore
(800) 272-7324
cell: 617-271-5044

Rep. Barney Frank - Repudiate DNC Chairman Howard Dean's call for surrender in Iraq

Republican congressional candidate Chuck Morse calls on Congressman Barney Frank to repudiate DNC Chairman Howard Dean's irresponsible and dangerous comments on the war in Iraq.

10 days before historic elections in Iraq, with Sunni Arab politicians participating for the first time, Democratic party chairman Howard Dean is calling the American military operation "a failed strategy." Mr. Dean has chosen this inopportune moment to inveigh himself into a war. This shameless political maneuver could contribute toward destabilizing a region fighting a war on terrorism which would additionally place the lives of American personnel at greater risk.

Chairman Dean's declaration that "we need to be out of there" demonstrates once again that he lacks the temperament to lead a major American political party. Howard Dean should immediately resign from his position.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. Actually, Kerry said NO MILITARY SUCCESS IS POSSIBLE now - only POLITICAL
Edited on Tue Dec-06-05 08:56 PM by blm
SUCCESS can be achieved. So that puts Kerry and Dean pretty much in sync except Kerry's plan is for drawdown over 13 months, while Dean says 2 yrs, but that's probably Dean's compromise with the more centrist Dems like Biden and Clinton.

BTW...Murtha used the same words as Kerry - no military success is possible - only political success.

It would be more helpful to the Democratic party if posts were more ACCURATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC