Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush destroys the Voting Rights Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:35 PM
Original message
Bush destroys the Voting Rights Act
This effectively guts the Voting Rights Act by shutting out career Justice Department staff members and turning over major decisions to Bush cronies.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/09/AR2005120901894.html

Staff Opinions Banned In Voting Rights Cases
Criticism of Justice Dept.'s Rights Division Grows


By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer

The Justice Department has barred staff attorneys from offering recommendations in major Voting Rights Act cases, marking a significant change in the procedures meant to insulate such decisions from politics, congressional aides and current and former employees familiar with the issue said.

Disclosure of the change comes amid growing public criticism of Justice Department decisions to approve Republican-engineered plans in Texas and Georgia that were found to hurt minority voters by career staff attorneys who analyzed the plans. Political appointees overruled staff findings in both cases.

The policy was implemented in the Georgia case, said a Justice employee who, like others interviewed, spoke on condition of anonymity because of fears of retaliation. A staff memo urged rejecting the state's plan to require photo identification at the polls because it would harm black voters.

But under the new policy, the recommendation was stripped out of that document and was not forwarded to higher officials in the Civil Rights Division, several sources familiar with the incident said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our forefathers are no doubt rolling over in their grave over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Expect whistleblowers in the staff to start leaking to the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's most likely how this story came out
But so far all they have done publicly -- without risking dismissal -- is to boycott the department's Christmas party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Blogged by Brad on 12/2/2005 ...
Bush DoJ Appointees Overruled their Own Voting Rights Act Attorneys to Approve Texas Redistricting Plan!

Unanimous Recommendation by 8 Staffers, Including Head of Voting Rights Division Ignored!
As With Georgia Photo ID Case, Bush Makes Mockery of Voting Rights Act, Ranking Democrat Calls for House Judiciary Committee Investigation

Washington Post, in a stunning front page splash today, is reporting that political appointees in George W. Bush's Dept. of Justice overruled their own attorneys in the Voting Rights Act unit who had recommended against Texas' state redistricting plan for Congressional districts. That new redistricting plan was key to former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's (R-TX) controversial strategy in the state which eventually resulted in 7 additional Republicans being elected to the U.S. House in 2004.

Eight staffers at the DoJ, including the heads of the Voting Rights Division advocated against the redistricting in a 73-page memo, but Bush political appointees agreed to allow the changes to go through anyway! The Voting Rights Act requires DoJ pre-approval of changes to electoral law in several states where minority voting rights have historically been an issue.

The disturbing revelation is similar to one reported two weeks ago in which the Bush Attorney General overruled 4 of 5 staffers who had recommended against pre-approval of Georgia's new Photo ID requirement at the polls. That law has since been struck down by Federal Courts which described it as a "Jim Crow-era Poll Tax."

The Bush administration has made a mockery of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 which celebrated it's 40th anniversary over the summer. Rep. John Conyers has now asked for a full investigation by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee...

Full Story, Link to Full Memo and the Complete Text of Conyers' Press Release:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002107.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What's new is that now
the staff isn't even allowed to make a recommendation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Newsworthy it is.
My apologies if it was inferred by my date inclusion in the posting head that I thought this 'old' or unworthy of posting. It was to provide background and a link to Conyer's notice.

Recommended & kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is there a Research Thread open to document these stories?
Seems to be several election shennanigans stories coming up right now-- plus a zeitgeist on DU re: election reform.

I know there is a dedicated Forum. Maybe post this in Research too?

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That would probably be a good idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. does JC Watts like this republican agenda? surrrrrrre he does nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. CIA carreer hands are leaving the co. in droves too.
* is an American tragedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ah, the press won't do anything about this.
The press are pussies.

and so are we.

I'm a pussy, he's pussy, she's a pussy, The're a pussy, wouldn't you like to be a pussy too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. why don't the Republicans just announce who won
and not bother with an election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. Talk about your activist judges?
Here we have activist political hacks acting to thwart the will of Congress when it passed the Voting Rights Act and prevent any action before it even can be heard by a judge.

Strict Constructionists my ass! The only thing strict is their narrow view of how the world must look and who will run it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC