Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Brooks said he wants the Dems to win some of the spotsin 2006..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 01:57 PM
Original message
David Brooks said he wants the Dems to win some of the spotsin 2006..
elections, so that they can accept some of the responsiblity for what is going on in the government. This wishywashy bastard always changes his tune to fit bush's argument.What he wants is for them to win so that they can plot to tie some of this mess to Dems, so that by the time the 2008 election comes up they will have set something up to plant on some unsuspecting senator or congressman, so that they can use this in the presidental race. If people are that stupid to fall for this, something has to be wrong with their brains. Bush and his crew are trying to tie the every problem we have to the war. Anybody can look around in this world and see the problems and notice how bush is always on the wrong side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. but he is right. A balance creates creative tension, checks, balances.
I have a parent who thinks Atilla was a communist-socialist, and still (40% of the time) believes what the president says. Even he wishes that the Democrats had the majority in at least one house. He thinks it makes for smarter, better and healthier government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. yea it's a big part of the playbook.remember...
all the complaints about "there are some up there in Washington" stuff?He always THEY always had Daschle to paint as a Bin Laden type blocking the agenda.BTW screw Brooks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Protagoras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. He wants to appear less than a total Propagandist
because he knows his neocon ship is sinking and he wants to keep his job at the NYT when the dust settles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. so that they can accept some of the responsiblity for what is going on???
LOL!!!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Governing is hard work--why not wish for some GOP integrity now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC