Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton: DLC committed to win elections and do right by the country

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:17 PM
Original message
Bill Clinton: DLC committed to win elections and do right by the country
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 07:20 PM by wyldwolf
The first New Democrat.

In the 1968 Indiana primary, Bobby Kennedy became the first New Democrat. He believed in civil rights for all and special privileges for none, in giving poor people a hand up rather than a handout: work was better than welfare. He understood in a visceral way that progressive politics requires the advocacy of both new policies and fundamental values, both far-reaching change and social stability. If he had become President, America's journey through the rest of the twentieth century would have been very different.

Going to the Democratic Leadership Council.

In 1985, I got involved in the newly formed Democratic Leadership Council, a group dedicated to forging a winning message for the Democrats based on fiscal responsibility, creative new ideas on social policy, and a commitment to a strong national defense. Later on, I traveled to thirteen states and the District of Columbia to speak on topics about evenly divided between politics and policy. The most important political speech was one called "Democratic Capitalism," which I delivered to the DLC in Williamsburg, Virginia. I thought the DLC was the only group committed to developing the new ideas Democrats needed both to win elections and do right by the country. In Williamsburg, I spoke about the need to make access to the global economy "democratic" -- that is, available to all citizens and communities. I had become a convert to William Julius Wilson's argument, articulated in his book The Truly Disadvantaged, that there were no race-specific solutions to hard-core unemployment and poverty. The only answers were schools, adult education and training, and jobs.

In March 1990 I went to New Orleans to accept the chairmanship of the DLC. I was convinced the group's ideas on welfare reform, criminal justice, education, and economic growth were crucial to the future of the Democratic Party and the nation. In December, we launched the Texas DLC chapter in Austin. In my speech, I argued that, contrary to our liberal critics, we were good Democrats. We believed in keeping the American dream alive for all people. We believed in government, though not in the status quo. And we believed government was spending too much on yesterday and today -- interest on debt, defense, more money for the same health care -- and too little on tomorrow: education, the environment, research and development, the infrastructure. I said the DLC stood for a modern, mainstream agenda: the expansion of opportunity, not bureaucracy; choice in public schools and child care; responsibility and empowerment for poor people; and reinventing government, away from the top-down bureaucracy of the industrial era, to a leaner, more flexible, more innovative model appropriate for the modern global economy.

I was trying to develop a national message for the Democrats, and the effort fueled speculation that I might enter the presidential race in 1992. I spent the next few months  traveling the country for the DLC. Because I was out there making the case for how we could regain "mainstream, middle-class" voters who "have left the party in droves for twenty years," the press continued to speculate that I might run in 1992.

The DLC's mission.

While I still didn't believe I could or should run, and President Bush's approval ratings were still above 70 percent in the afterglow of the Gulf War, I was beginning to think a DLC Democrat who could relate both to the party's traditional base and to swing voters might have a chance, because the country had serious problems that weren't being addressed in Washington. The President and his team seemed determined to coast to victory on the wings of the Gulf War. I had seen enough in Arkansas and in my travels around the country to know America couldn't coast through four more years. As 1991 unfolded, more and more people came to share that view.

Bill Clinton, New Democrat
Book Excerpt

MY LIFE
by Bill Clinton

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=127&subid=173&contentid=252794

The Strongest Economy in a Generation. Longest Economic Expansion in U.S. History. In February 2000, the United States entered the 107th consecutive month of economic expansion -- the longest economic expansion in history.

21.2 million new jobs were created since 1993, the most jobs ever created under a single Administration -- and more new jobs than Presidents Reagan and Bush created during their three terms. 92 percent (19.4 million) of the new jobs were created in the private sector, the highest percentage in 50 years.

Fastest and Longest Real Wage Growth in Over Three Decades. In the last 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased 3.7 percent -- faster than the rate of inflation. The United States has had five consecutive years of real wage growth -- the longest consecutive increase since the 1960s. Since 1993, real wages are up 6.8 percent, after declining 4.3 percent during the Reagan and Bush years.

Unemployment was the lowest Nearly the Lowest in Three Decades.

Highest Homeownership Rate in History.

Lowest Poverty Rate in Two Decades. The poverty rate has fallen from 15.1 percent in 1993 to 12.7 percent in 1998. That's the lowest poverty rate since 1979 and the largest five-year drop in poverty in nearly 30 years (1965-1970). The African-American poverty rate has dropped from 33.1 percent in 1993 to 26.1 percent in 1998 -- the lowest level ever recorded and the largest five-year drop in African-American poverty in more than a quarter century (1967-1972). The poverty rate for Hispanics is at the lowest level since 1979, and dropped to 25.6 percent in 1998.

Largest Five-Year Drop in Child Poverty Rate Since the ‘60s. Under President Clinton and Vice President Gore, child poverty has declined from 22.7 percent in 1993 to 18.9 percent in 1998 -- the biggest five-year drop in nearly 30 years. The poverty rate for African-American children has fallen from 46.1 percent in 1993 to 36.7 percent in 1998 -- a level that is still too high, but is the lowest level in 20 years and the biggest five-year drop on record. The rate also fell for Hispanic children, from 36.8 percent to 34.4 percent - and is now 6.5 percentage points lower than it was in 1993.

Improved Access to Affordable, Quality Child Care and Early Childhood Programs.

Increased the Minimum Wage.

Enacted Single Largest Investment in Health Care for Children since 1965.

Extended Strong, Enforceable Patient Protections for Millions of Americans.

CLINTON developed the nation's first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator of anti-terrorist efforts.

Bill Clinton stopped cold the Al Qaeda millennium hijacking and bombing plots.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to kill the Pope.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Boston airport.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.

Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.

Bill Clinton tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).

Bill Clinton brought perpetrators of first World Trade Center bombing and CIA killings to justice.

Bill Clinton did not blame the Bush I administration for first World Trade Center bombing even though it occurred 38 days after Bush left office. Instead, worked hard, even obsessively -- and successfully -- to stop future terrorist attacks.

Bill Clinton named the Hart-Rudman commission to report on nature of terrorist threats and major steps to be taken to combat terrorism.

Bill Clinton increased the military budget by an average of 14 per cent, reversing the trend under Bush I.

Bill Clinton tripled the budget of the FBI for counterterrorism and doubled overall funding for counterterrorism.

Bill Clinton detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries.

Bill Clinton created national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.

Of Clinton's efforts says Robert Oakley, Reagan Ambassador for Counterterrorism: "Overall, I give them very high marks" and "The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama".

Paul Bremer, current Civilian Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley as he believed the Bill Clinton Administration had "correctly focused on bin Laden.

Barton Gellman in the Washington Post put it best, "By any measure available, Bill Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him" and was the "first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort".

The Democratic party's agenda, as linked by you, has "Strength Overseas" as it's second item. During the Clinton years...

... Clinton brought a brutal dictator, Milosovec, to justice and haulted ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.

....Clinton crafted a Chemical Weapons Ban Treaty.

... Clinton deployed a Defense Reinvest and Conversion. Bush enjoying weapons developed and purchased by Clinton today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. RFK would not have touched the DLC with a ten foot pole!
It is wrong to smear him like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Agreed
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 07:29 PM by Hippo_Tron
We're talking about a guy who wanted to expand on LBJ's Great Society. Had the DLC been around in the 1960's they would look at the Great Society and say that there are too many handouts for poor people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. That quake you feel is Bobby spinning in his grave
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 08:39 PM by Maccagirl
How dare they use the great man's name to lend credibility to their agenda! RFK,Jr. or Teddy better set them right. I was around then, and I don't recall Bobby being on anyone's board of directors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Sez you....
In fact, the attacks on Bobby from the left in 68 were very much like the anti-DLC rhetoric these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can't have both.
DLC is Republican Lite with all the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. They will do Extremely Right, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushclipper Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great post! Recommended!
:kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick:

..for BILL CLINTON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. 1995 Gallup poll: 62% favored creating a 3rd party
DLC doesn't get it. Never will.

http://www.fairvote.org/irv/end_majority_rule.htm

A Gallup poll in August 1995 showed that 62% of Americans favored "formation of a third political party that would run candidates for President, Congress and state offices against the Republican and Democratic candidates." The support for such a third party increased steadily the younger the voting age group, with 18-29-year-olds favoring formation of a third party by a lopsided 72%-18% margin. Gallup also found that the proportion of voters calling themselves independents had doubled since 1940 to its current 39%.

As Colin Powell has remarked, the national results in 1992 and 1994 indicate an electorate that is "channel-surfing." In 1992, voters tried the Democrats and Bill Clinton, in 1994 they tried the Republicans and Newt Gingrich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Where were the 62% in 96, 00, 04? Perot and Nader could have used 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Guess they didn't represent the interests of the 62%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Scoop Jackson & Hubert Humphrey were proto-DLC.
How dare you rip off RFK's good name. It's like the neocons at Encounter and The New Republic who tried to steal Orwell's corpus in 1984. Political grave robbery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I remember that.
Those cokesackers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Orwell would have castrated the lesser Blair.
The neocons would have feared his Remington portable.

We miss you, Eric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's easy to see where they went wrong:
1) giving poor people a hand up rather than a handout: Uh, doofus, you need to do BOTH. People down at the bottom with no way up need to be given sustenance and hope. Then you can start giving them tools. Pretending you can do away with handouts for people on the very bottom is why starving people during the Irish potato famine were forced to clear roads when they could barely stand BEFORE they were given a bowl of watery oatmeal. It doesn't work, and only leads to blaming the starving for staying starved.


2) work was better than welfare: Yeah, it sure was, but only in the good old days when it would support a family in decent housing, with decent food, decent clothing, a little left over for luxuries like an occasional movie and a once a year vacation, and most of all, health care when it was needed.

Maybe if they stopped being bluenosed, stingy Repuglicans they could win elections. Then we'd start calling them Democrats.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bobby wanted to stop the War
Not Bill. New Democrat. Pfff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. That is utterly wrong on RFK. There are plenty of biographies
out there that actually talk about RFK and his beliefs. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. well, recommend a few you've read and quote from some
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. What has the DLC done for us lately.
Have said it before -- observing Bill Clinton & the DLC was like watching a superstar rock band that rose to the top, broke up, and then only one of the original members continued to have a stellar career, making it clear who had been carrying the whole group all along.

I would LOVE for the DLC to offer a message which I, as a pro-universal health care, pro-living wage, anti-corporatist Democrat could embrace and be passionate about. I was never more excited than when Bill Clinton and Al Gore won the elections.

But I'm not holding my breath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton WH years were good! It is the post Clinton DLC that is worrisome!
Especially Adolf Lieberman, who is a staunch PNAC supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Josh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. DO NOT USE THE NAME "ADOLF"
That is unacceptable in this context. Don't do it.

On an unrelated topic, without Clinton and the DLC we would now be into the first term of whoever Dan Quale's Vice President would have been. The problem is that those who run and run with the DLC have forgotten the true values it held when it was created. It was not supposed to be, "Let's move to the right to win elections," it was supposed to be the dynamic centre. The Third Way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. If the DLC were in charge in 1964
they would have opted to retain the South firmly in the Democratic Camp, and would have told President Johnson to veto the Civil Rights Act.

We can't do anything without a majority, so that means we can't do anything with the majority :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Great post....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Wish I could vote "zero"
If the DLC headquarters were burning, I wouldn't piss on it. We don't need the old Republican party back. We need a Democratic Party that believes in good government and policies that do the most good for the most people. Triangulation and pandering to corporations is the last thing I will support.

If the DLC takes over again, I am so fucking out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. RFK was no DLCer. He fought for all people.
No compromises were made with the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
25. this is why....
....people are pi$$ed at the repugs but the Dems don't seem to benefit from their 'pi$$titude'....people think that both Parties SUCK!....if there was ever a time for a meaningful opposition 3rd party to take root, now is the time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Great job Wyldwolf...
Too bad so many Democrats don't want to trumpet the accomplishments of a Democratic President..on a board dedicated to getting Democrats elected...kinda ironic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. Still love Bill - but he is NOT DLC. he won IN SPITE of DLC
Sorry, but taking cradit by association ain't washing with me. They kiss up to W - that can't be a good strategy to...what again? Win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. LOL! Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. Could someone do the research here?
I already have URLs for the Millenium plot, but it would make a great addition to the Research forum to have the documentation down in black and white for the rest of the list.

Bill Clinton stopped cold the Al Qaeda millennium hijacking and bombing plots.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to kill the Pope.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Boston airport.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.
Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. He did not stop cold a planned attack to blow him in the Oral Office!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. And still no health care worth a darn
Edited on Fri Dec-16-05 01:08 AM by EC
they caved on that...and to me, that is the most important concern to get our economy back on track and take care of our citizens...


On edit: Tonight on Larry King, Bill Mahr said straight out that unless Dems start to stand for real progressive issues, they'll lose again. He said also,(a point I make whenever in this discussion with others) that 79% of Americans refused to vote because they were not being represented by either candidate, and that until someone stands up for a genuine health care system and care of the environment and workers rights, they will keep losing. He really doesn't like the Hillery wing (DLC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
31. Didn't he give us corporate welfare reform... oh no just poor people welfa
re reform. And wasn't Bill Clinton that executed a retarded person as governor of arkansas so he could appeal to DLC/repuke type assholes as a tough guy so could win the oval office. Oh and didn't slick willy support this criminal war and doesn't he and his wife continue to support further murder for oil and corporate control.

RFK was a REAL democrat with principle and backbone. Fuck the DLC! Give me a principled progressive like RFK, Wellstone, McKinney etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
32. Very interesting
but what a load of

Ripped up another large envelope from Hillary this week. They just don't get it when you tell them to bugger off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. You know nothing about Bobby Kennedy!
Calling Bobby the first "New Democrat" is a smear.

How can you attack Gene McCarthy for opposing Humphrey in another pro-DLC thread of yours, when Bobby Kennedy also attacked Humphrey and the war in Iraq.

What's next for the DLC? That America was founded as a Christian nation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. kennedy DID work for Joe McCarthy in the early 50's
Edited on Fri Dec-16-05 08:06 AM by jonnyblitz
as an assistant council which sounds about right for a "new democrat"(snicker) but he obviously smartened up later on in the 60's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. The real Bobby Kennedy would laugh his ass off...
...upon reading your silly post.

Educate yourself. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. actually, I didn't make that statement.
Read the post again.

Did Bobby Kennedy attack the war in Iraq from beyond the grave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
34. One man does not the DLC make,
nor do two, three or four men (or women).

What makes the DLC is what they represent, which is corporate interests.

If the DLC is supposed to represent the interests of 'the common man' then why are there no common men in the DLC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
39. The DLC seems to me to be more Communitarian than Progressive
in outlook. In all to many areas, the DLC turned its back on the concept of individual liberty that was at the core of traditional liberalism, and which distinguished it from the J. Edgar Hoover brand of conservatism, IMHO.

IMHO, communitarianism and its anti-rights mindset is a sinking ship, and not one that anyone should be tying their boat to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC