Three FREEPER thread that will make you LOL!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1544039/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1544038/posts (OP gets banned for this)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1544037/posts

These people are going to go on a rampage if Bush is impeached!

Target Practice for me.

n/t

than answering issues.

Gee, duh, wonder where they picked that tactic up? * et al of course.

As for their comments re liberals etc, that really is sick. They get that from the Coulter creature and others. Pure ignorant hate.

And their graphic of a cat with a shield is pretty lame too.

I mostly looked at the one in which the OP was banned.

comments like liberals are the reason why some animals eat their young.

That general tone of hatred and images of violence, I don't think I see here.

It was a little surreal visiting that site - pictures of kitty cats & guns, random insults & weird abbreviations, no real discussion that I could see. DU, even at its worst, is nowhere near as bad.

He went from despising Bush to supporting him. I wonder if he has buyer's remorse yet.

Thats all RimJob cares about!

"The democrats have positioned themselves such that anything good for America is bad for the democrats'......

What delusional world do they live in?

Aren't they cute with their secret little acronyms and talk of "Viking Kitties".

What an inbred bunch of Short-Bus Veterans for Truth.

Zot = banning

It's people like you, willing to jump headfirst into the slime so the rest of us may see the true evil.

:toast:

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )

"It's not over 'till Arnold gropes the fat lady" —Bill Press, on MSNBC

The utter ignorance of these people is astounding. Heck they even banned the obvious * supporter who tried to suggest that in fact * did lie. They are blinded by their own ignorance. Gawd, they are stuuuuuppppppiiiiiiiddddddd!

I nearly wet my pants when I saw the "bunny with a pancake on its head" picture!!!!
:rofl:

that's when you know we're onto something.

is that it is they who are placing the significance on polling, then claiming that it doesn't matter.

And from the Moonie Times, even better.

http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/bfein.htm

there are no problems, everybody's happy but a few crazies."

I guess it's just that koolaid.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I can only begin to imagine what's posted there:

Favorite Prussian Blue lyrics
Recipes for meth
Pet abuse pix
How to beat your wife without leaving marks
David Duke appreciation threads

Used his executive power in the same manner?


I ventured into Freeperland for a moment and in the interest of obtaining the best counterargument to their desperate defensive arguments, I would like to know if this is something that has been done before by Democrats... They allude to the fact that our god FDR did it as well as CLinton...

Any truth to this?

What he specifically did was legal at the time. In 1995 Clinton changed the law to make it illegal. Freepers are lying again.
http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/20/the-gorelick-myth/

The Gorelick Myth
In the National Review, Byron York has an article called “Clinton Claimed Authority to Order No-Warrant Searches.” In it, he cites then-Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick’s July 14, 1994 testimony where she argues “the President has inherent authority to conduct warrantless physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes.” (This afternoon, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) quoted her testimony on the Senate floor.)

Here is what York obscures: at the time of Gorelick’s testimony, physical searches weren’t covered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). It’s not surprising that, in 1994, Gorelick argued that physical searches weren’t covered by FISA. They weren’t. With Clinton’s backing, the law was amended in 1995 to include physical searches.

York claims that, after the law was amended, “the Clinton administration did not back down from its contention that the president had the authority to act when necessary.” That’s false. Neither Gorelick or the Clinton administration ever argued that president’s inherent “authority” allowed him to ignore FISA. (We’ve posted the full text of Gorelick’s testimony here).

I picture them sitting there all day, switching back and forth between the local weather website, then freerepublic, then local weather, then freerepublic...

They are the type of people who, when snow is predicted, crowd the bread aisle of the supermarket and buy it out.

I really need to stop reading those!

I don't have my dictionary handy, but I don't think "shimera" is in it.

Oops, somebody over there must've gone to spellcheck. After my Jimmy Buffet incident a while back, I should know better than to mock another's spelling skills.