Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Political Debate On Stress Disorder(As Claims Rise, VA Takes Stock)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 09:53 PM
Original message
A Political Debate On Stress Disorder(As Claims Rise, VA Takes Stock)
Edited on Mon Dec-26-05 09:54 PM by cal04
The spiraling cost of post-traumatic stress disorder among war veterans has triggered a politically charged debate and ignited fears that the government is trying to limit expensive benefits for emotionally scarred troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. In the past five years, the number of veterans receiving compensation for the disorder commonly called PTSD has grown nearly seven times as fast as the number receiving benefits for disabilities in general, according to a report this year by the inspector general of the Department of Veterans Affairs. A total of 215,871 veterans received PTSD benefit payments last year at a cost of $4.3 billion, up from $1.7 billion in 1999 -- a jump of more than 150 percent.

Experts say the sharp increase does not begin to factor in the potential impact of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, because the increase is largely the result of Vietnam War vets seeking treatment decades after their combat experiences. Facing a budget crunch, experts within and outside the Veterans Affairs Department are raising concerns about fraudulent claims, wondering whether the structure of government benefits discourages healing, and even questioning the utility and objectivity of the diagnosis itself. "On the one hand, it is good that people are reaching out for help," said Jeff Schrade, communications director for the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee. "At the same time, as more people reach out for help, it squeezes the budget further."

Among the issues being discussed, he said, was whether veterans who show signs of recovery should continue to receive disability compensation: "Whether anyone has the political courage to cut them off -- I don't know that Congress has that will, but we'll see." Much of the debate is taking place out of public sight, including an internal VA meeting in Philadelphia this month. The department has also been in negotiations with the Institute of Medicine over a review of the "utility and objectiveness" of PTSD diagnostic criteria and the validity of screening techniques, a process that could have profound implications for returning soldiers.

The growing national debate over the Iraq war has changed the nature of the discussion over PTSD, some participants said. "It has become a pro-war-versus-antiwar issue," said one VA official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because politics is not supposed to enter the debate. "If we show that PTSD is prevalent and severe, that becomes one more little reason we should stop waging war. If, on the other hand, PTSD rates are low . . . that is convenient for the Bush administration."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/26/AR2005122600792.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. "questioning the utility and objectivity of the diagnosis itself"
Through war, this country has created these disorders, and are now questioning the diagnosis? My bil suffers tremendously from PTSD from VN, and it's only gotten worse, not better.
I fear for the new crop of vets and their families who have to deal with this horror.:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. As I have posted before, I often
work with people who have been damaged by PTSD. It is the effect of war, as Babylonsister wrote, that lasts for decades after the soldier returns home. It has horrid effects, not just on the primary sufferer, but on his or her family. Plenty of family abuse, both physical and emotional, gets heaped on people who live with the PTSD person.
Personally, I think that the people who have been serving in Afghanistan and Iraq have been subjected to even worse PTSD-causing situations than those who served in Vietnam.
The financial price we will pay to help these people cope with the aftermath of the horror they have lived with will be a small one if it prevents even some of the adverse effects we have seen with the Vietnam vets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thousands of National Guard troops in unexpected overseas
combat. Extended tours, jobs and famillies torn asunder. The ever present question that hangs over every death, every wound every hardship; "Why?" The psychological price this country will pay for just this one policy of this piece of shit president George W. Bush is yet to be tallied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just wait about 10-20 yrs...
when the effects of those untreated veterans, unable to cope with their past, are fully displayed by their children. This problem is born of, and nurtured by our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC