Ashcroft, Miers, Gonzales "now under close scrutiny" for advising Spy Boy

Bush's counsel on spying now under close scrutiny
By Peter S. Canellos, Globe Columnist | December 27, 2005

WASHINGTON -- When President Bush sought to reassure the country that his authorization of spying on Americans without warrants was a reasonable exercise of his power, he emphasized that his orders were always reviewed by the attorney general and the White House counsel. ''Each review is based on a fresh intelligence assessment of terrorist threats to continuity of our government and the threat of catastrophic damage to our homeland," Bush said in his Dec. 17 radio address. ''The review includes approval by our nation's top legal officials, including the attorney general and the counsel to the president." The current occupants of those jobs are Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and White House counsel Harriet E. Miers. Prior to 2005, Gonzales was White House counsel and John Ashcroft was attorney general.

The current dispute over whether the president had the authority to order domestic spying without warrants, despite a law against it, has put new focus on the legal officials who have guided Bush. And the qualifications of Ashcroft, Gonzales, and Miers could become a focus of the upcoming Senate hearings on the spying decision.

Legal advice given to the president in national security matters can hardly be of greater importance. Telling Bush that he lacks the authority to make a particular move could leave the country vulnerable to attack; assuring him that he has the power to override civil liberties could consign innocent suspects to imprisonment, abuse, or disappearance to secret holding areas in other countries.

Since Sept. 11, 2001, Bush's legal advisers have cleared the way for him to hold enemy combatants without trials; eavesdrop on overseas telephone calls and e-mails; place ever-greater numbers of government documents under a veil of secrecy; imprison a US citizen indefinitely on the suspicion of terrorist links; and, according to The Washington Post, operate a secret CIA prison in an Eastern European country. In each case, the legal official responsible for assessing the extent of Bush's powers was Ashcroft, Gonzales, or Miers.



http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/12/27/bushs_counsel_on_spying_now_under_close_scrutiny?mode=PF

almost Supreme Court mole.

...preferably BEFORE his SCOTUS hearings.

:patriot:

going to have to put it all off on their neocon plant law clerks. We know that this stuff does not have the markings of Harri. It does smell like the kind of stuff J. Yoo was cranking out: Why the WH can Embrace Torture Tactics in a Nutshell.

at Justice. He knew what was coming.

It never made sense that he would push such an unqualified candidate as Harriet is. But, NOW it does. He thought he could get her through and he'd be golden. She would cover Gonzales, Asscroft and Yu's butts!

We were saved on this one by the Neo-Cons like Krystol and Frum. Although they must have known about Bushies Imperial Spying and it's hard to understand why they stopped his evil little attempt to push pathetic Harriet into place. :shrug:

in any other administration. Do people just grow ugly the longer they hang with the Bushes?

1. The Globe is starting to get feisty (ref this and the 12/26 op-ed, see the HOME page and the Massachusetts forum).

2. The WH is running scared, setting up Gonzalez as the fall boy.

I doubt seriously, just as with every other felony, they will do their damn jobs and actually undertake a congression investigation.