Who should be Hillary's VP candidate?

This is interesting speculation, but just that...she won't be the nominew.

ensuring a Clinton would remain president for yet another generation.

ABH!!!!!!

A perfect match!!!!:sarcasm:

to be back in the white house and be in the center of power.

Bill is the MOST successful democrat alive today. There is no
one who can stop him making Hillary the nominee and the president
by winning the general election.

Frankly, I loved the Clinton era and am wishing for it to reappear.

That would be a pretty good ticket.

More subtle than usual!

What do you suppose the average age is of people who post comments like this?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2340561&mesg_id=2340578

snicker....

There is often a difference!!!

speaking of mental age. snicker..

Uses language such as that...calling out is warranted!

She's turning into a DINO just like him.

Birds of a feather.

same diff

Hilary is a one term senator. She is not qualified to be President.

No more DLC.

:shrug:

If so, then Hillary remains a Senator and does NOT run.

Like it or not she is political CYANIDE for the Dems if she runs for President.

The Rethugs would love it if she were nominated because they know what we don't seem to understand - this country will not elect a woman during my lifetime (and I'm 45). Why do you think Faux is making up all these polls that say she's the Democratic frontrunner? Because they want her to be. I wish that she'd understand that, ignore her ambitions, and stay out of the race. But, to be fair, if I were in her shoes and I saw all the media stories about how I could be top dog, I'm not sure I'd stay out of the race myself.

If that conservative cow is shoved down the party's throat by the DLC, they can kiss my vote goodbye.

if she is smart. Because she won't be the nominee.

I am hoping against all hope she will not be the nominee.

TC

She does not have our votes at all. I want to win for once. I hope she does not get the nomination. We have too much to lose to risk it right now. Maybe in eight years or so she could run. We need time to get Dem's in and fix the country. We do not need someone who thought the Iraq debacle was a good idea. Anyone could see what it was all about.

I for one would be very happy to have Hillary as the Democratic candidate!!!

What a better way for the GOP to regroup after the disastrous Bush years than to have the Democrats oblige them by nominating Hillary for President. Instead of a vigorous debate about the harm that Bush/Cheney have done to our country, and an alternate Democratic vision for America, we end up with a nominee that will become the sole issue of the 2008 campaign.

Not surprisng that so many cower in fear here.

Fact is people on both sides have been underestimating the Clinton's for 20 years...and always end up looking foolish.

Some things never change!

Clinton - Lieberman

I have to admit that I can't remember liking much of anything he has said in the last few years. But persuade me to think differently?

Perish the thought that anyone believe that I want EITHER of them NEAR the W.H.

That makes more sense. :)

I hear Zell Miller has a lot of free time these days.
:evilgrin:

Hell, they wouldn't even have to bother appointing a new Cabinet!
How smooth is that?

She is the wrong candidate at this time.
Wrong for every reason and in every category.

Calling Al Gore.

deeelicious.

oh. god. we're. in. trouble.

i've wine do less.

:)

into my heart. Won't you?

i just was taken aback by pairing ''our lady of chuckles'' charles with hillary

The neocon religious reich ticket. Let them get hysterical about flag burning and video games (while they plan more Likud corporatist wars) and meanwhile, we can pick a DEMOCRAT to run on our ticket.

It would be a terrific ticket either way - Clinton/Edwards or Edwards/Clinton.

A dark horse for VP would be Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack. He would be a moderate, well spoken midwestern Governor.

Vilsack would spell doom to any ticket - he's only big in his house (Iowa) or the DGA or DLC outside of that nobody knows or cares who he is. Go read the news reports of his glorious trip to the FLA Democrats convention. Wonder if anything important was going on that weekend....Oh, yeah, Iowa was poised to lose it's First in the Nation Caucus. What? our Governor didn't care? Our Governor wasn't there? Nope, only sowing the seeds for his big '08 run. Ugh :eyes:

:hi:

How are you doing? Any big New Year's plans?

She's not going to be the nominee.

She's got too much baggage. The Repugs are salivating at the idea of her running. It'll bring up all of the Whitewater/Ken Starr/Impeachment/Rose Law Firm/Travelgate nonsense and distract from their own massive failings.

My money is on Richardson/Obama, myself.

We need a president with good sense and a commitment to helping the country come together again. We are more split now than ever before.

I for one am sick of politics as usual. Electing Hilary (If she could win which is unlikely) would only widen the divide.

Actually I like John Roberts if I needed to make a choice but I'm not choosing the better of two evils again. Its in in best interest as citizens to vote for the candidate we like best. Instead we are lazy....Alas

Shit, why not? He's as qualified for that job as the one he just got. And as qualified as Hillary, for that matter.

Seriously, you really didn't mean John Roberts, did you?

He's smart, Likeable, SOUTHERN, Young, Good Looking, a good spokesman, a great lawyer. Ihaven't heard anything bad about him? Have you?

He can Win. He made Cheney look so grumpy in the staged debates.

John Roberts was Bush's pick for Supreme Court justice!

Oh damn yes thats what I meant.

but am afraid that this country is not yet smart enough to vote in a woman.
If she did run, I’d like Bill Clinton to be the VP. Why not go all out?

I don’t know if there are any rules against it, but I would love to see it.
The world would be fascinated with the ying yang of it all.

I just hope this country is smart enough NOT to vote for Hillary Clinton.

JMHO.

They work so well as a team....:puke:

while the Big Female Dog cavorts with the war criminal Putin in Moscow.

The entertainment value of such a ticket sure beats any late breaking news from Aruba.

:popcorn:

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

(Almost) Anyone But Hillary!

The repukes would LOVE if she became the democratic nominee, they've successfully vilified her ever since Bill stepped into office. The Republicans sheer hatred for Hilary would bring them out in droves and could sway many independents/undecided voters. The Republican haterd for her would unite them more than the Democratic support for her would unite us. If she is the nominee we will have a Republican in the White House again I can assure you.

Still,if worse came to worst I think Clark would be the best choice for the ticket. I'm not a Hilary Clinton fan at all, but I would hold my nose and vote for her. If she was to pick someone like Lieberman as her running mate however, she would definitely not get my vote.

Hillary is convinced that SHE has the credentials on national security (great at voting for war) and Arkansas all tied up.

Our country needs leadership not poll readers.

and Joe Lieberman for Secretary of Offense...

If the Democrats are so hell-bent on self-destruction that they end up nominating Hillary for President, we might as well finish the job by putting Holy Joe as her running mate.

Hillary and Lieberman. Not only will our party have Joementum, but this will silence all those awful Libruls who whine about nonsense like White Phosphorus.

Sharon needs a new wife to watch his diet!

(May I compose the menu?)

:D

:-)

Since she won't be the nominee, I think that would be the best candidate. I coulda said "vapor"...

Gore/Clinton. Either one will do for me. And to who doesn't agree: I am entitled to my opinion as well. I'll see your Hillary/Bill/Al Gore hate and raise you a million loves for them.

Now, if you'll pardon me (and if you were a Clinton or a Gore, I know you would), I will be :popcorn: waiting for your insults.


<Jamastiene slips on flame proof outfit and slips off happy knowing she spoke her mind.>
Okay, now.

Ready



Set




Flame Away!!!!!

:popcorn:

Not to worry, Jamastiene. There are many here that find the gratuitous bashing (they call it constructive criticism) of Democrats nothing short of pathetic. The density of these types here does not reflect the true numbers "out there." I'll stand with you.

Actually, I think that any candidate other than maybe Barbara Boxer, should take Feingold as VP if they win the nomination.

She basically shouted him down in front of senators during a private Senate meeting on campaign-finance reform.

She wouldn't want someone with integrity on her ticket!

However, I’m not sure about the constitutional consequences that his nomination would bring forth.

nothing could save any ticket with Hillary on the top or bottom.

Doesn't matter because she's unelectable.

by even suggesting HRC's inevitability. They want her badly. They know they can energize their base against her. How on earth does Hillary win a general election? Does she get a single Republican vote? Does she energize the Dem. base when so many Progressives will be apathetic or stay home? Does she get any male votes other than Dems. who show up to pull the "D" lever? I don't even know many Dem. women who are excited about her. Can you spell 48-state defeat?

Hillary's "people" are well aware of the loss we will face, but let's put ego uber alles. They see a slim, I repeat SLIM, possibility of how it could work out. The only problem the Hillaries have is their need for blinders. Put a woman in the vp spot of the republican ticket and all bets are off. Mostly they spout that Hillary can win if no one is running against her. Yeah...that's gonna happen---not.

So what I'm hearing is that Hillary will carry 10 states. But hey! At least the rightwing will come out in force.

If female Prez...Boxer?

Or male, Durbin? Or Conyers.

Just give us a REAL Dem, please.