The freepers are finally admitting that we are losing the war

<Unless the world finds a solution to the suicide bomber, the terrorists are going to win.
You can't HANG somebody for a suicide bombing, they're already dead.>

<You cannot win a war where your civilians are being killed and you refrain yourself from doing the same. The other side will consider your restraint weakness and will escalate the intensity of the attacks.>

It's also interesting how few responses this post has in freeperville
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1552299/posts

to getting soldiers out of there, as we've been trying to do?
Nah, I don't see that happening. We need to save face, regardless
of who's dying. :eyes:

"Kill them all and let God sort them out." - that is what he is saying, in effect.


To: propertius
Unless the world finds a solution to the suicide bomber, the terrorists are going to win.
You can't HANG somebody for a suicide bombing, they're already dead.

But vengeance has to pursue these a$$holes beyond the grave and the world has to begin to understand that a suicide bombing is a group crime and not an individual crime.

Basically, you go after their bodies, and you go after their families. You put whatever is left of one of these criminals in a box along with the remains of a pig, and drop it into the center of his town or village from 30,000 feet for everybody there to see.

And, if you really want to be serious about the whole thing, you round up every member of the a$$hole's immediate family and kill them; mother, father, brothers, sisters, wife, and kids.

If that sounds terrible, consider that you'd only have to do it once or twice, and there'd never be another suicide bombing. Twenty or thirty people would die as opposed to the hundreds who are dying now.


4 posted on 01/05/2006 6:11:32 AM PST by darkocean

sorry bout that. yours wasn't up there when i first started writing. what a sick f*ck, though, ey? JEEBUS!

as if it isn't ridiculous enough NOW to say we're there to spread freedom. I wonder if this blowhard would be able to pull the trigger on dozens of relatives and children to "send a message."

as if indiscriminate slaughter of civilians is going to stop suicide bombing. What a dumb fuck.

"you'd only have to do it once or twice."

uh huh.

and if that doesn't work?

bull-dozing the houses of relatives and dropping bombs on apartment blocks to get one person. Doesn't stop the violence.

Killing people more and more people isn't gonna work, considering there's a billion more muslims and 5.99 billion non-freepers who aren't gonna be pleased with that kinda tactic.

"If that sounds terrible, consider that you'd only have to do it once or twice, and there'd never be another suicide bombing. Twenty or thirty people would die as opposed to the hundreds who are dying now."

And how many times has this strategy been tried and failed? Hundreds? Thousands?

"darkocean" sent this reply to "propertius"

"Basically, you go after their bodies, and you go after their families. You put whatever is left of one of these criminals in a box along with the remains of a pig, and drop it into the center of his town or village from 30,000 feet for everybody there to see.

And, if you really want to be serious about the whole thing, you round up every member of the a$$hole's immediate family and kill them; mother, father, brothers, sisters, wife, and KIDS."


So tell me again, why were supposed to try to find "common ground" with these psychopaths??

Great post, but please don't send me to that freepsite again!!!! I feel violated. Need to go take a shower or two or three!!! :wow: :wow: :wow: :wow:

I think we should run, not walk, with our tails between our legs like a whipped dog.... because that is what we are. We have no business being there and we have been whipped good.

If you disagree with me I have almost 2200 pieces of evidence to prove it.

So this site is why they're called "Freepers?" I wonder if that last extremest poster at the freeper site is aware of the connections between Bush and the Bin L. family... Was the movie F 911 true? Did His Royal Chimpness allow them to fly away without answering any questions back when the rest of America was grounded?

"I agree. Furthermore we know these bombers are trained and supported by Syria and Iran. Nothing prevents the US to sponsor the same type of attacks on their elites and elite communities where their families go shopping and recreation. During World War II when one country sends bombers to attack cities, the attacked country retaliates in the same manner. Countries that uses terrorism to attack civil targets should get the same treatment. You cannot win a war where your civilians are being killed and you refrain yourself from doing the same. The other side will consider your restraint weakness and will escalate the intensity of the attacks."- A REPLY ON FREEPER

Since when are terrorist the moral yardstick for this country.

then we'll see if he thinks it's still a good idea.

i guess it is okay to be brave with someone elses life.

in using "suicide" bomber . . . :evilgrin:

Freepers like to think that they are among the best informed when it comes to poilitical issues. But anyone who reads their site (as I do daily) can see that Freepers are the most intentionally ill-informed group in the whole blogosphere. The reason for that, of course, is that they "ZOT" all opinions or facts that don't match their preconceived conclusions, and do backflips to make excuses for Smirk's many constitutional and ethical violations.

Add the ignorance that causes to the other ongoing examples of their wrong-headed, pig-headedness (such as accusing Clinton of illegally poring through 500 FBI files, which never happened, or claiming that Paula Jones sued Clinton for sexual harassment, which she did not) and the result is that the one website where you can almost be certain of not hearing the truh is Free Republic. It's also the one place an American can go to see phoney patriots eagerly shredding the Constitution for crass political ends.

We know that. But they don't, and neither do the lazy "journalists" who depend upon them as a source.