Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NSA Destroyed Evidence of Domestic Spying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:30 PM
Original message
NSA Destroyed Evidence of Domestic Spying
January 5, 2006

NSA Destroyed Evidence of Domestic Spying
by Jason Leopold


http://www.opednews.com

The National Security Agency, the top-secret spy shop that has been secretly eavesdropping on Americans under a plan authorized by President Bush four years ago, destroyed the names of thousands of Americans and US companies it collected on its own volition following 9/11, because the agency feared it would be taken to task by lawmakers for conducting unlawful surveillance on United States citizens without authorization from a court, according to a little known report published in October 2001 and intelligence officials familiar with the NSA's operations.

NSA lawyers advised the agency to immediately destroy the names of thousands of American citizens and businesses it collected shortly after 9/11 in its quest to target terrorists in this country. NSA lawyers told the agency that the surveillance was illegal and that it could not share the data it collected with the CIA or other intelligence agencies.

The lawyers said the surveillance could result in numerous lawsuits from people identified in the surveillance reports, two former US officials told the Houston Chronicle in an October 27, 2001, report, and was illegal despite any terrorist threat that existed in the days following 9/11.

By law, the NSA cannot spy on a US citizen, an immigrant lawfully admitted to this country for permanent residence, or a US corporation. But, with the permission of a special court, it can target foreigners inside the United States, including diplomats.

The revelation raises new questions about the legality of the NSA's domestic spying initiative, authorized by President Bush in 2002, which has come under intense scrutiny by Republicans and Democrats and will likely lead to Congressional hearings.


http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jason_le_060105_nsa_destroyed_eviden.htm

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Demand Congressional Inquiry into Illegal NSA Spy Scandal

http://www.usalone.net/cgi-bin/oen.cgi?qnum=86


Before the 2004 election Kerry pressed Bush to release the report:

snip...

Kerry also issued a statement Saturday calling on Bush to release a 2001 report by the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board that reportedly recommended a major restructuring of the U.S. intelligence community, including establishing a single intelligence director.

The board's chairman, retired Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, was national security adviser under Bush's father and President Ford.

"The White House has held this important report under wraps for nearly three years while resisting efforts to strengthen the intelligence services that are essential to preventing terrorist attacks and protecting our nation," Kerry said in the statement. "What is the White House hiding? Why shouldn't the Congress and the American people be able to fully consider General Scowcroft's recommendations?"

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/09/11/politics2131EDT0620.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Destroying evidence
is a felony also....isn't it?

I guess there has to be some kind of investigation first though????

Ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Perhaps you should do a search on Jason Leopold before backing this horse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here is his background:
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 04:42 PM by ProSense
Jason Leopold spent two years covering California's electricity crisis as Los Angeles bureau chief of Dow Jones Newswires. Jason has spent the last year cultivating sources close to the CIA leak investigation, and is a regular contributer to t r u t h o u t.

another link to the story:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010506I.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Why would you doubt him seriousstan?
Leopold sounds like he's on the up & up to me.. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Do th deep google
That is all I have saaid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogmi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I believe this is
called obstruction of justice. Although you might be right, the investigation has to start first. Maybe tampering with evidence. Doesn't matter to me. I think that they are treasonous bastards that should hang from the yardarm.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fawn Hall works for the NSA?
:rofl: They don't really stray that far from the formula, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This is CRIMINAL....violates the CONSTITUTION...the same one Bush
promised to UPHOLD during the swearin ceremony....damn....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I wasn't intending to "take it lightly" but I was intending to
"make light of it". I am past rage today and on to hysterical laughter. So much info to process, it just boggles my mind sometimes. Primal Screams give way to giggling I guess. Not intended to offend at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I wasn't Offended....LOL......offended by Bush tho...not by you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC